基于HS-SPME/GC×GC-TOFMS/OAV不同栗香特征绿茶关键香气组分分析

doi:10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20190126-337

食品科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 244-252.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20190126-337

基于HS-SPME/GC×GC-TOFMS/OAV不同栗香特征绿茶关键香气组分分析

张铭铭，尹洪旭，邓余良，姚月凤，江用文，滑金杰，袁海波，杨艳芹

（1.中国农业科学院茶叶研究所，农业部茶树生物学与资源利用重点实验室，浙江杭州 310008； 2.中国农业科学院研究生院，北京 100081）

出版日期:2020-01-25 发布日期:2020-01-19
基金资助:
浙江省自然科学基金项目（LQ18C160006）；浙江省三农六方项目（CTZB-F180706LWZ-SNY1-13）；中国农业科学院创新工程项目（CAAS-ASTIP-2014-TRICAAS）

Analysis of Key Odorants Responsible for Different Chestnut-Like Aromas of Green Teas Based on Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction Coupled with Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry and Odor Activity Value

ZHANG Mingming, YIN Hongxu, DENG Yuliang, YAO Yuefeng, JIANG Yongwen, HUA Jinjie, YUAN Haibo, YANG Yanqin

(1. Key Laboratory of Tea Biology and Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310008, China;2. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

Online:2020-01-25 Published:2020-01-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用顶空固相微萃取结合全二维气相色谱-飞行时间质谱技术分析3 类典型栗香绿茶的挥发性成分，并采用香气活度值（odor activity value，OAV）法对关键香气组分进行筛选。结果表明：3 类不同栗香特征的绿茶共鉴定出79 种共有香气组分，其中萜烯类较多，醛类物质相对含量最高；基于OAV不小于1，共筛选出12 种关键香气组分，其中己醛、1-辛烯-3-酮、β-紫罗兰酮在3 类典型栗香绿茶中OAV均不小于10，特别是1-辛烯-3-酮在3 类典型栗香绿茶中OAV均超过100；以OAV结果为基础，在模拟体系中添加相同浓度和比例的关键香气组分进行香气重构，3 类典型栗香重构样与对照样的夹角余弦值均在0.97以上。本研究明确了12 种关键香气组分对栗香绿茶特征香气的贡献作用，并通过香气重组实验进一步证实了结果的可靠性，为绿茶赋香物的定性及量化理论研究提供了一定的理论依据。

关键词: 顶空固相微萃取, 全二维气相色谱-飞行时间质谱, 栗香绿茶, 气味活度值

Abstract: The volatile components of green tea samples with three different typical chestnut-like aromas were investigated using headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) combined with comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC × GC-TOFMS). The key odorants responsible for chestnut-like aroma were identified based on their odor activity values (OAV). The results showed that a total of 79 compounds were identified as common components among the three chestnut-like aromas, the majority of which were terpenes, while aldehydes showed the highest content. Moreover, 12 compounds with OAV ≥ 1 were identified as the key odorants responsible for the chestnut-like aromas, among which hexanal, 1-octen-3-one and trans-β-ionone exhibited higher OAV (≥ 10). Notably, 1-octen-3-one showed the highest OAV ( > 100) in all three chestnut-like aroma types. In addition, based on the OAV results, the key aroma components added at the same concentrations and ratios to the simulation system for aroma reconstitution. The cosine values of reconstituted samples and standard references for the three typical chestnut-like aromas were all above 0.97. The contribution of 12 key aroma components to the characteristic aroma of chestnut-like green teas were preliminarily confirmed, and the reliability was further confirmed by aroma reconstitution experiments. The results provide theoretical support for qualitatively and quantitatively evaluating green tea aroma compounds.

Key words: headspace solid phase microextraction, comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry, green teas with chestnut-like aroma, odor activity value

中图分类号:

TS272.5

张铭铭，尹洪旭，邓余良，姚月凤，江用文，滑金杰，袁海波，杨艳芹. 基于HS-SPME/GC×GC-TOFMS/OAV不同栗香特征绿茶关键香气组分分析[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(2): 244-252.

ZHANG Mingming, YIN Hongxu, DENG Yuliang, YAO Yuefeng, JIANG Yongwen, HUA Jinjie, YUAN Haibo, YANG Yanqin. Analysis of Key Odorants Responsible for Different Chestnut-Like Aromas of Green Teas Based on Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction Coupled with Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry and Odor Activity Value[J]. FOOD SCIENCE, 2020, 41(2): 244-252.

[1]	刘盼盼，郑鹏程，龚自明，常泽睿，苏方俊，黄波，冯琳，高士伟，郑琳. 橘红茶香气特征及风味成分分析[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(8): 198-205.
[2]	丁丹，王松磊，罗瑞明，王永瑞，柏霜，沈菲，柏鹤. 基于SPME-GC-MS分析不同烤制时间新疆烤羊腿表层及内层挥发性化合物[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(2): 227-234.
[3]	王贺，赵玉红，杨凯. HS-SPME-GC-MS结合电子鼻对10 个品系红松籽油挥发性物质分析比较[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(18): 178-184.
[4]	符成刚，刘文玉，陈友志，李玉梅，李欢康，周靖，张孔雀，魏长庆. 加热温度对新疆马脂理化性质、脂肪酸及挥发性风味化合物的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(16): 54-60.
[5]	李欢康，杨佳玮，刘文玉，魏长庆. 不同工艺核桃油挥发性物质比对及关键香气成分表征[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(16): 185-192.
[6]	王华杰，滑金杰，余勤艳，江用文，王近近，杨艳芹，邓余良，袁海波. 基于IRAE-HS-SPME/GC-MS分析杀青方式对绿茶栗香形成的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(14): 209-217.
[7]	依胜男，芦晶，逄晓阳，郝莉雨，张书文，吕加平. 热处理对牛乳美拉德反应程度及挥发性成分的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(14): 9-15.
[8]	张倩，朱婷婷，黄明泉，魏金旺，吴继红，霍嘉颖. 白酒中两种萜烯类化合物的细胞内抗氧化活性[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(9): 66-73.
[9]	郑开迪，梁杉，张敏，朱永，李欣萍. 添加马铃薯全粉对面条挥发性风味化合物的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(6): 239-245.
[10]	汪冬冬，唐垚，陈功，李恒，明建英，蔡地烽，王勇，伍亚龙，张其圣. 不同发酵方式盐渍萝卜挥发性成分动态分析[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(6): 146-154.
[11]	朱晓凤，刘政权，宛晓春，陶勐，肖志鹏，程淑华. SDE和HS-SPME结合GC-MS分析霍山黄大茶香气成分的比较[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(4): 214-221.
[12]	张鹏云，管维，李蓉，龙春霞，卢俊文，林淑绵，张峰. 顶空-固相微萃取法与水蒸气蒸馏法提取山银花挥发性组分的比较[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(4): 178-184.
[13]	李俊杰，徐元昊，陈梦娟，邓高文，吴凯，蒋立文. 手筑茯砖茶加工过程中挥发性组分变化分析[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(24): 144-154.
[14]	贾潜，程超，田成，李伟，周志，莫开菊，汪兴平. 不同处理对糟姜风味成分的影响及风味保真比较[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(24): 172-178.
[15]	陈丽丽，白春清，袁美兰，江勇，赵利. 全二维气相色谱-质谱法对鱼露发酵过程中挥发性风味成分分析[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(22): 238-244.

基于HS-SPME/GC×GC-TOFMS/OAV不同栗香特征绿茶关键香气组分分析

Analysis of Key Odorants Responsible for Different Chestnut-Like Aromas of Green Teas Based on Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction Coupled with Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry and Odor Activity Value

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价