食品科学 ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3 ): 266-271.

• 专题论述 • 上一篇    下一篇

食品中农药最大残留限量标准的安全漏洞分析

李太平   

  1. 南京农业大学经济管理学院
  • 收稿日期:2010-06-17 修回日期:2011-01-07 出版日期:2011-02-15 发布日期:2011-01-13
  • 通讯作者: 李太平 E-mail:ltp@njau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    南京农业大学农林经济管理学科建设经费资助项目(JGNL200912);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(KYZ201009);南京农业大学人文社会科学研究基金项目(SK2010001)

Safety Trap Analysis of Maximal Residue Limits of Pesticides in Foods

  • Received:2010-06-17 Revised:2011-01-07 Online:2011-02-15 Published:2011-01-13

摘要: 农药最大残留限量标准是判别食品安全的基础依据,研究农药残留标准本身是否存在安全漏洞,对化解食品安全风险具有十分重要的现实意义。本文利用农药最大残留限量(MRLs)、日允许摄入量(ADI)与被测食品每日最大理论摄入量(TDI)三者之间的数量关系,以GB 2763 — 2005《食品中农药最大残留限量》为例,计算126 种农药439 个残留限量指标的TDI 值,并与消费者每日实际摄入量(RDI)进行比较,发现35 个残留指标的食品有不同比例消费者的RDI 超过TDI,占GB 2763 — 2005 中478 个指标的7.3%,表明我国现行农药残留国家标准存在较大的安全漏洞,建议政府尽快修订该标准,以消除食品安全管理隐患。

关键词: 农药残留, 国家标准, 食品安全漏洞

Abstract: Standards of maximum residue limits(MRLs) for pesticides are the key bases of food safety identification. Safety trap analysis of pesticide residue standards has very important value for avoiding the risk on food safety. This paper, by taking national standard Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides in Food (GB 2763—2005) as a example, calculated the theory daily intake (TDI) of 439 residue indexes of 126 pesticides in foods and the correlation between MRLs, ADI(acceptable daily in take) and TDI, and then compared with the customer s Real Daily Intake (RDI). Among foods with 35 residue indexes, there were TDI values higher than their corresponding RDI values for different proportion customers, accounting for 7.3% of 478 pesticide residue indexes list in this national standard. It was concluded that this standard had a big safety risk trap and the government should revise this standard as soon as possible in order to eliminate the management trap on food safety.

Key words: pesticide residue, national standards, food safety trap

中图分类号: