蛋白质组学在乳酸菌应激反应机制研究中的应用

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 蛋白质组是研究细胞内全部蛋白质的存在及其活动方式。各种外界环境胁迫会诱导乳酸菌不同种类和数目的蛋白质表达发生变化，涉及复杂的代谢调控途径。本文通过从蛋白质组水平上揭示蛋白质表达模式的动态变化，有助于阐明乳酸菌在环境胁迫下的应激反应分子调节机制。

关键词: 乳酸菌, 蛋白质组, 胁迫

Abstract: Proteomics is the large-scale study of proteins, particularly their structures and functions. Environmental stress is able to induce the expression of different proteins in lactic acid bacteria as response. Proteome studies is helpful to understand the molecular mechanisms of stress response of lactic acid bacteria in order to adapt to or resist the stress.

Key words: lactic acid bacteria, proteomics, stress

中图分类号:

TS201.3

乌日娜1，孙志宏2，张文羿2，陈永福2，刘文俊2，钟?智2，张和平2,*. 蛋白质组学在乳酸菌应激反应机制研究中的应用[J]. 食品科学, 2013, 34(1): 324-327.

参考文献

[1] WILKINS M R，SANCHEZ J C，GOOLEY A A, et al. Progress with proteome projects: why all proteins expressed by a genome should be identified and how to do it. Biotechnol Genetic Engineering Rev[J], 1996，13：19-50.
[2] 贺福初. 蛋白质组学研究——后基因组时代的生力军[J]. 科学通报，1999，44（2）: 113-122.
[3] 金世琳. 乳酸菌的科学与技术[J]. 中国乳品工业，1998，26（2）：14-16.
[4] CHAMPOMIET-VERGES M C, MAGUIN E, MISTOU M Y, et al. Lactic acid bacteria and proteomics: current knowledge and perspectives [J].J Chromatography, 2002, 771:329.
[5] ANG D, LIBEREK K, SKOWYR D, et al. Biological role and regulation of the universally conserved heat shock proteins [J]. J Biol Chem, 1991, 266:24233-24236.
[6] WU R, SUN Z, WU J, et al. Effect of bile salts stress on protein synthesis of Lactobacillus casei Zhang revealed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis[J]. J Dairy Science, 2010, 93: 3858-3868.
[7] WU R, WANG W, YU D, et al. Proteomics analysis of Lactobacillus casei Zhang, a new probiotic bacterium isolated from traditionally home-made koumiss in Inner Mongolia of China [J]. MCP, 2009,8(10)：2321-2338.
[8] HARTKE A, BOUCHE S, GIARD J C, et al. The lactic acid stress response of Lactococcus lactis subsp. Lactis[J]. Curr Microbiol, 1996, 33: 194.
[9] BUDIN-VERNEUIL A, VIANNEY P, YANICK A, et al. Proteomic characterization of the acid tolerance response in Lactococcus lactis MG1363[J]. Proteomics, 2005, 5, 4794–4807.
[10] KILSTRUP M, JACOBSEN S, HAMMER K, et al. Induction of Heat Shock Proteins DnaK, GroEL, and GroES by Salt Stress in Lactococcus lactis[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1997, 63(5): 1826–1837.
[11] PRASAD J, MCJARROW P, GOPAL P. Heat and osmotic stress responses of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 (DR20) in relation to viability after drying[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003, 69(2): 917–925.
[12] De ANGELIS M, GOBBETTI M, BINI L, et al. The acid-stress response in Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis CB1 [J]. Microbiol, 2001, 147: 1863-1873.
[13] HORMANN S, SCHEYHING C, BEHR J, et al. Comparative proteome approach to characterize the high-pressure stress response of Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis DSM 20451T[J]. Proteomics, 2006, 6, 1878–1885.
[14] LORCA GL, VALDEZ G F. A low-pH inducible, stationary-phase acid-tolerance response in L.acidophilus CRL639 [J]. Curr Microbial, 2001, 42: 21-25.
[15] DI CAGNO R, DE ANGELIS M, LIMITONE A, et al. Response of Lactobacillus helveticus PR4 to Heat Stress during Propagation in Cheese Whey with a Gradient of Decreasing Temperatures[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2006, 4503–4514.
[16] GOUESBET G, JAN G, BOYAVAL P. Two-dimensional electrophoresis study of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus thermotolerance[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2002, 68(3): 1055–1063.
[17] DE Angelis M, DI CAGNO R, HUET C, et al. Heat shock response in Lactobacillus plantarum[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2004, 70(3): 1336–1346.
[18] LEE K, LEE H G, PI K, et al. The effect of low pH on protein expression by probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri [J]. Proteomics, 2008, 8: 1624-1630.
[19] SANCHEZ B, CHAMPOMIER–VERGES M, ANGLADE P, et al. Pteomic analysis of global changes in protein expression during bile salt exposure of Bifidobacterium longum NCIMB 8809 [J]. J Bacteriol, 2005, 187: 5799-5808.
[20] FLAHAUT S, FRERE J, BOUTIBONNES P, et al. Comparison of the bile salts and sodium dodecyl sulfate stress responses in Enterococcus faecalis[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1996, 62(7): 2416–2420.
[21] FLAHAUT S, HARTKE A, GIARD J C, et al. Alkaline Stress response in Enterococcus faecalis: adaptation, cross-protection, and changes in protein synthesis[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1997, 63(2): 812–814.
[22] 张英华，雷雨婷，霍贵成. 细菌中小分子冷休克蛋白的研究现状[J].中国乳品工业，2008，36（1）：48-51.
[23] VAN DE GUCHTE M, SERROR P, CHERVAUX C, et al. Stress responses in lactic acid bacteria[J]. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2002, 82(1-4): 187-216.
[24] WOUTERS, J A, SANDERS, J. W., KOK, J, et al. Clustered organization and transcriptional analysis of a family of csp genes of Lactococcus lactis MG1363[J]. Microbiol, 1998, 144, 2885-2893.
[25] WOUTERS J A, JEYNOV B, ROMBOUTS F M, et al. Analysis of the role of 7 kDa cold-shock proteins of Lactococcus lactis MG1363 in cryoprotection[J]. Microbiol, 1999, 145: 3185–3194.
[26] WOUTERS J A, ROMBOUT F M, de VOS W M, et al. Cold Shock Proteins and Low-Temperature Response of Streptococcus thermophilus CNRZ302[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1999, 65(10): 4436-4442.
[27] TREMPY S J E. Expression of clpX, an ATPase Subunit of the Clp Protease, is heat and cold shock inducible in Lactococcus lactis [J]. J Dairy Sci, 2001, 84(8): 1783-1785.
[28] EI Demerdash H A M, Heller K J, Geis A. Application of the shsp gene, encoding a small heat shock protein, as a food-gradese lection marker for lactic acid bacteria [J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2003, 69: 4408-4412
[29] KULLEN M J, KLAENHAMMER T R. Identification of the pH inducible, proton-translocating F1FO-ATPase (atpBEFHAGDC) operon of Lactobacillus acidophilus by differential display: gene structure, cloning and characterization [J]. Mol Microbiol, 1999, 33:1152-1161.
[30] GUILLOT A, GITTON C, ANGLADE P, et al. Proteomic analysis of Lactococcus lactis, a lactic acid bacterium [J]. Proteomics, 2003, 3: 337-354.
[31] SANCHEZ B, CHAMPOMIER-VERGES M, COLLADO M C, et al. Low-pH adaptation and the acid tolerance response of Bifidobacterium longum [J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2007, 73(20): 6450–6459.
[32] LEVERRIER P, DIMOVA D, PICHEREAU V, et al. Susceptibility and adaptive response to bile salts in Propionibacterium freudenreichii: physiological and proteomic analysis [J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2003, 69: 3809-3818.
[33] HERVE-JIMENEZ, L, GUILLOUARD, I, GUEDON, E, et al. Postgenomic analysis of Streptococcus thermophilus cocultivated in milk with Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus: involvement of nitrogen, purine, and iron metabolism[J]. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 200975, 2062–2073.
[34] PAUL C D, COLIN H. Surviving the acid test: responses of gram-positive bacteria to low pH [J]. Curr Microbiol Mol Bio Rev, 2003, 67:429-453.
[35] 乌日娜，武俊瑞，孟和，等. 乳酸菌酸胁迫反应机制研究进展[J]. 微生物学杂志，2007, 27(2): 62-66.
[36] VINCENT F, YATES D, GARMAN E, et al. The three-dimensional structure of the N-acetylglucosamine-6-phosphate deacetylase, NagA, from Bacillus subtilis: a member of the urease superfamily[J]. J Biol. Chem, 2004, 279, 2809-2816.
[37] WU R, ZHANG W, SUN T, et al. Proteomics analysis of response of Lactobacillus casei Zhang to low acid stress[J]. Int J Food Microbiol, 2011,147: 181–187.
[38] DREWS O, REIL G, PARLAR H et al. Setting up standards and a reference map for the alkaline proteome of the Gram-positive bacterium Lactococcus lactis[J]. Proteomics 2004,4,1293–1304
[39] FOZOL E M, QUIVEY R G. Jr. Shifts in the membrane fatty acid profile of Streptococcus mutans enhance survival in acidic environments[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2004, 929-936.
[40] 乌日娜，岳喜庆，张和平. 干酪乳杆菌对数生长期与稳定期蛋白质组比较分析[J]. 食品科学，2011,.
[41] DE ANGELIS M, GOBBETTI M. Environmental stress responses in Lactobacillus: A review [J]. Proteomics, 2004, 4:106-122.
[42] COHEN D P A, RENES J, BOUWMAN F G, et al. Proteomic analysis of log to stationary growth phase Lactobacillus plantarum cells and a 2-DE database[J]. Proteomics 2006, 6, 6485–6493.