食品科学 ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (21): 275-279.

• 营养卫生 • 上一篇    下一篇

套作大豆贮藏蛋白、氨基酸组成分析及营养评价

蒋 涛,杨文钰*,刘卫国,王 凤   

  1. 四川农业大学农学院,农业部西南作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2012-04-08 修回日期:2012-10-22 出版日期:2012-11-15 发布日期:2012-11-09
  • 通讯作者: 杨文钰 E-mail:wenyu.yang@263.net
  • 基金资助:

    科技部国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划):作物多样性对病虫害生态调控和土壤地力的影响

Storage Protein and Amino Acid Composition Analysis and Nutrition Evaluation of Relay-Cropped Soybean

  • Received:2012-04-08 Revised:2012-10-22 Online:2012-11-15 Published:2012-11-09

摘要: 目的:分析不同品质类型套作大豆贮藏蛋白、氨基酸组分特征,对套作大豆蛋白质的营养价值进行评价。方法:使用近红外谷物分析仪、氨基酸分析仪等测定大豆蛋白质、氨基酸等指标。结果:套作大豆蛋白质平均含量48.71%,贮藏蛋白7S、11S相对含量分别为24.94%和67.57%,11S/7S比值高达2.74,高蛋白型套作大豆D3(中江+月黄)贮藏蛋白11S/7S高达3.08,比其净作(11S/7S比值为2.89)极显著升高0.19(P=0.001);套作大豆氨基酸总量达到37.3%,其中必需氨基酸含量占总氨基酸的38%以上,接近或高于FAO/WHO、全蛋参考模式同种氨基酸含量;FAO/WHO参考模式下套作大豆5种化学评分:氨基酸评分(AAS)、化学评分(CS)、必需氨基酸指数(EAAI)、氨基酸比值系数分(SRCAA)和必需氨基酸相对比值(EAARR)分别为64.34、76.82、82.10、83.06、78.06,与净作相比分别变化:2.38(P=0.002)、3.01(P=0.012)、0.03(P=0.209)、0.45(P=0.202)、-0.19(P=0.754)。结论:套作大豆具有与净作大豆一致甚至更高的氨基酸营养价值,11S/7S比值更合理,可保证大豆蛋白制品的品质。因此选择综合营养价值高的大豆品种与玉米进行套作种植。

关键词: 套作大豆, 贮藏蛋白, 氨基酸, 营养评价

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the storage protein and amino acid composition and evaluate the nutritional value of three different relay-cropped soybean cultivars: Guixia No.3, Gongxuan No.1 and Zhongjiang Shiyuehuang. Methods: Soybean protein was determined using a near infrared grain analyzer, and amino acid composition was determined using an automatic amino acid analyzer. Results: The average content of relay-cropped soybean protein was 48.71%, and the relative contents of storage protein 7S and 11S were 24.94% and 67.57%, respectively. As far as the high-protein cultivar Zhongjiang Shiyuehuang was concerned, relay-cropped soybean had a storage protein 11S/7S ratio as high as 3.08, which was significantly increased by 0.19 (P = 0.001) compared with that of (2.89) of solo-cropped soybean. The average amino acid content in relay-cropped soybean was 37.3%, and the average ratio of essential to total amino acids was not less than 38%, close to or larger than that obtained from the FAO/WHO standard or the whole egg reference pattern. According to the FAO/WHO reference pattern, the  amino acid score (AAS), chemical score (CS), essential amino acid index (EAAI), score of RCAA (SRCAA) of relay-cropped soybean were 64.34, 76.82, 82.10, 83.06 and 78.06, respectively, with variations of 2.38 (P = 0.002), 3.01 (P = 0.012), 0.03 (P = 0.209), 0.45 (P = 0.202) and -0.19 (P = 0.754) when compared with solo-cropping soybean. Conclusion: Relay-cropped soybean has the same or even higher nutritional value as solo-cropped soybean and more reasonable 11S/7S ratio which is good for the quality of soybean protein products. As a consequence, it is necessary to select highly nutritional soybean cultivars for relay-cropping with corn.

Key words: relay-cropping soybean, storage protein, amino acids, nutritional evaluation

中图分类号: