烟熏工艺对熏肉挥发性风味物质的影响

doi:10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201306040

食品科学 ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 180-187.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201306040

烟熏工艺对熏肉挥发性风味物质的影响

赵冰，任琳，陈文华，乔晓玲*，李家鹏，赵燕

中国肉类食品综合研究中心，北京食品科学研究院，北京 100068

收稿日期:2012-11-20 修回日期:2013-01-29 出版日期:2013-03-25 发布日期:2013-03-01
通讯作者: 乔晓玲 E-mail:cmrcsen@126.com
基金资助:
质检公益性行业科研专项

Effects of Different Smoking Methods on Volatile Flavor Compounds in Bacon

ZHAO Bing，REN Lin，CHEN Wen-hua，QIAO Xiao-ling*，LI Jia-peng，ZHAO Yan

China Meat Research Center, Beijing Academy of Food Sciences, Beijing 100068, China

Received:2012-11-20 Revised:2013-01-29 Online:2013-03-25 Published:2013-03-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以熏猪肉为对象，研究传统木熏工艺和现代液熏工艺对熏肉挥发性风味物质的影响。对其挥发性风味物质进行GC-MS分析，重点比较两种烟熏方式产品的特色挥发性风味物质的差别。结果表明，传统木熏工艺产品的挥发性风味物质在种类和数量方面都明显高于现代液熏工艺的产品，传统木熏工艺的产品检测出130种挥发性风味物质，而现代液熏工艺检测出121种，酚类物质作为烟熏产品的特色挥发性风味物质，传统木熏工艺的产品检测出15种，含量达到22.85%，而现代的液熏工艺的产品检测出14种，含量仅为7.87%。因此，传统的木熏工艺在风味方面仍然具有一定的优势。

关键词: 熏肉, 烟熏液, 风味物质, 气相色谱-质谱, 酚类化合物

Abstract: The effects of traditional wood smoking and modern fluid smoking on the volatile flavor compounds in bacon were studied in order to provide a theoretical support for the improvement of modern liquid smoked products. The characteristic flavor of both types of smoked products was evaluated by determining volatile flavor compounds by GCMS. The results demonstrated that the variety and quantity of volatile flavor compounds were significantly higher in traditional wood smoked products when compared with modern liquid smoked products. Totally, 130 kinds of volatile flavor compounds were detected from traditional wood smoked products while only 121 kinds of volatile flavor compounds were detected from modern liquid smoked products. Furthermore, the content of characteristic volatile flavor compounds, namely phenolic compounds including 15 phenols in the traditional wood smoked products reached 22.85%; in contrast, 14 kinds of phenolic compounds with a total content of only 7.87% were found in modern liquid smoked products. Therefore, the traditional wood smoking process remains superior for the flavor of smoked products.

Key words: bacon；liquid smoke, flavor component, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), phenolic compounds

中图分类号:

TS251

赵冰，任琳，陈文华，乔晓玲*，李家鹏，赵燕. 烟熏工艺对熏肉挥发性风味物质的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2013, 34(6): 180-187.

参考文献

参考文献：
[1] 杨书珍, 丁力, 罗婧敏等. 低温肉制品的烟熏工艺研究[J]. 肉类研究,2009 ,34 (10):126-132.
[2] 孙宝国.食用调香术[M]. 第二版。北京:化学工业出版社,2010,44-46.
[3] XIE J C, SUN B G, WANG S B. Aromatic constituents from Chinese traditional smoke-cured bacon of mini-pig[J]. Food Science and Technology International, 2008, 14(4): 329-340.
[4] YU A N, SUN B G, TIAN D T, et al. Analysis of volatile compounds in traditional smoke-cured bacon (CSCB) with different fiber coatings using SPME[J]. Food Chemistry, 2008, 110(1): 233-238.
[5] Igor J, Josip M, Snjezana T. A study of volatile flavour substances in Dalmatian traditional smoked ham: Impact of dry-curing and frying[J]. Food Chemistry, 2007,104(3):1030–1039.
[6] 余爱农, 宋新建, 刘应煊. 固相萃取辅助提取- 气相色谱- 质谱分析烟熏腊猪肉香气成分[J]. 食品科学,2004, 25,(8):134-137.
[7] 常海军, 周文斌, 王强. 肉品风味及影响因素研究进展[J]. 肉类工业, 2010,352 (8):46-49.
[8] 唐道邦, 夏延斌, 张滨. 肉的烟熏味形成机理及生产应用[J]. 肉类工业, 2004, 274(2):12-14.
[9] YU A N, SUN B G. Flavour substances of Chinese traditional smokecured bacon[J]. Food Chemistry, 2005, 89(2): 227-233.
[10] Ai-Nong Yu , Bao-Guo Sun, Da-Ting Tian. Analysis of volatile compounds in traditional smoke-cured bacon(CSCB) with different fiber coatings using SPME[J]. Food Chemistry, 2008,110(1):233–238.
[11] 吴金凤. 重庆农家腊肉风味物质研及其安全性评价[D]. 重庆;西南大学硕士学位论文,2008年.
[12] Eva H, Lorenzo H, Juan A. Headspace volatile compounds from salted and occasionally smoked dried meats (cecinas) as affected by animal species[J]. Food Chemistry, 2004,85 (4): 649–657.
[13] 余爱农, 吴绍艳. 烟熏腊猪肉香气成分的研究[J]. 2003, 24(10):135-138.
[14] 刘安军, 魏灵娜, 曹东旭. 美拉德反应制备烧烤型虾味香精及气质联用分析[J]. 现代食品科技, 2009, 25(6):674-680.
[15] 周洪仁, 周益群, 杜世祥. 烟熏液产生烟熏色泽的原理与方法探索[J].肉类工业, 2007, 311(3):34-35.
[16] 尚永彪, 吴金凤, 夏杨毅等. 农家腊肉冷熏加工过程中挥发性风味物质的变化[J]. 食品科学,2009, 30(17):79-83.
[17] 何洁, 宋焕禄, 陈耿俊等. 宣威火腿中香味活性化合物的分析[J]. 食品科技, 2008,(10):78-82.
[18] Stumpe-Vīksna I, Bartkeviсs V, Kukāre A, et al. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in meat smoked with different types of wood[J]. Food Chemistry,2008,110(3):794-797.

烟熏工艺对熏肉挥发性风味物质的影响

Effects of Different Smoking Methods on Volatile Flavor Compounds in Bacon

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘玉兰，舒垚，孙国昊，马宇翔，姜元荣，陈宁. 花生品种对花生酱风味及综合品质的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(9): 15-21.
[2]	李彩云，李洁，严守雷，王清章. 果蔬酶促褐变机理的研究进展[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(9): 283-292.
[3]	石元玥，杨宇帆，孔保华，王浩. 静电纺丝技术包埋天然酚类化合物研究进展[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(9): 319-327.
[4]	单启梅，赵晓策，罗瑞明，尤丽琴. 滩羊肌肉在煮制过程中可挥发性化合物的变化[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(8): 165-171.
[5]	王富云，王成财，王哲铭，江虹锐，闵斗勇，刘小玲，李树波. 虾青素微球对酸奶品质与风味的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(8): 172-178.
[6]	刘盼盼，郑鹏程，龚自明，常泽睿，苏方俊，黄波，冯琳，高士伟，郑琳. 橘红茶香气特征及风味成分分析[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(8): 198-205.
[7]	张舒，王长远，冯玉超，盛亚男，富天昕，张艺玮，姜颖俊，于淼，张丽媛. 气相色谱-质谱联用代谢组学技术分析不同产地稻米代谢物[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(8): 206-213.
[8]	陈卓，吴学凤，穆冬冬，何莹，张明珠，蔡静，侯志刚，郑志，梁进，张钰萌，李兴江. 红腐乳后酵期风味物质与细菌菌群分析[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(6): 118-125.
[9]	陈丽花，任丽霞，李东娜，马霞. 甜酒曲中优质酵母菌的分离鉴定及其产香特性分析[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(6): 142-149.
[10]	彭潇，邹文静，邵清清，孙中贯，张立华，李贺贺，王雪山. 石榴酒发酵过程中真菌种群演替及风味物质代谢规律解析[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(6): 157-163.
[11]	张琴，周丹丹，彭菁，潘磊庆，屠康. 油桃采后结合态香气变化规律及其与可溶性糖的关联性[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(6): 206-214.
[12]	程超，夏兰欣，杜芬妮，李伟，田成. 基于9 种风味物质的利川红SPME优化及PLS-DA风味识别[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(6): 215-222.
[13]	陈华磊，黄克兴，郑敏，杨朝霞. 基于非靶向风味组学分析3 种品牌啤酒的风味差异[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(6): 223-228.
[14]	康子悦，沈蒙，葛云飞，王娟，全志刚，肖金玲，王维浩，曹龙奎. 基于植物广泛靶向代谢组学技术探究小米粥中酚类化合物组成及其抗氧化性[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(4): 206-214.
[15]	郭丽，彭群华，赵锋，卢红渭，包兴伟，林智. 不同等级新九曲红梅茶的风味化学特征[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(4): 215-220.