食品科学

• 营养卫生 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同烹饪对模拟毒死蜱豇豆中的慢性膳食暴露评估

王向未1,仇厚援1,陈文学1,张志恒2,袁玉伟2,吴莉宇2,王 强2,*   

  1. 1.海南大学食品学院,海南 海口 571100;2.浙江省植物有害生物防控重点实验室-省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地,
    农业部农药残留检测重点实验室,浙江省农业科学院农产品质量标准研究所,浙江 杭州 310021
  • 出版日期:2013-09-15 发布日期:2013-09-27
  • 通讯作者: 王 强

Dietary Exposure Assessment of Chlorpyrifos in Cowpea Before and After Cooking

WANG Xiang-wei1, QIU Hou-yuan1,CHEN Wen-xue1, ZHANG Zhi-heng2,YUAN Yu-wei2,WU Li-yu2,WANG Qiang 2,*   

  1. 1. College of Food Science, Hainan University, Haikou 571100, China;2. State Key Laboratory Breeding Base for Zhejiang
    Sustainable Plant Pest Control, Key Laboratory for Pesticide Residue Detection, Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Quality and
    Standard for Agro-products, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China
  • Online:2013-09-15 Published:2013-09-27
  • Contact: WANG Qiang

摘要:

研究针对不同人群(2~3岁、4~6岁、7~10岁、11~13岁、14~17岁、18~29岁、30~44岁、45~59岁、60~69岁、70岁以上)不同性别(男性和女性)引入加工因子对烹饪前后豇豆中的毒死蜱进行慢性膳食暴露评估的研究。研究表明:经过清洗后再进行4种不同烹饪方式(炒制、微波、焯水、腌制烹饪)获得加工因子后,人群慢性暴露风险指数(CRfD)范围是7.5741~23.5425,其CRfD均小于100,处于可接受水平;在未引入加工因子时, CRfD范围是50.3599~111.0397,其中2~3岁、4~6岁、7~10岁男性和女性的CRfD范围在102.0552~111.0397,均大于100,处于高风险暴露水平,属于高危人群。未引入加工因子时的CRfD是引入加工因子时的5~10倍,因此引入加工因子后豇豆中的毒死蜱慢性膳食暴露评估的结果更接近实际值。经清洗后不同烹饪方式的加工方式对豇豆中的毒死蜱均有去除效果,微波烹饪效果最好,对指导消费者的膳食安全更具实际意义。

关键词: 烹饪, 毒死蜱, 加工因子, 膳食暴露评估, 慢性风险指数

Abstract:

This study was aimed to investigate the application of processing factors to dietary exposure assessment of
chlorpyrifos in cowpea during cooking in different age groups of different genders. Subjects of different ages were divided
into 10 groups: 2-3 years old, 4-6 years old, 7-10 years old, 11-13 years old, 14-17 years old, 18-29 years old, 30-
44 years old, 45-59 years old, 60–69 years old and ≥ 70 years old. The results showed the processing factors of cowpea
were obtained in different cooking modes after cleaning such as stir frying, microwave cooking, blanching and marination.
The chronic exposure risk index (CRfD) range was 7.5741-23.5425, lower than 100 and thus acceptabl, whereas the CRfD
range was 57.3599-111.0397 without taking the processing factors into consideration and the values in groups of 2-3, 4-
6 and 7-10 of both genders ranged from 102.0552 to 111.0397, which were higher than 100 and highly risky for subjects
in these groups. Accordingly, CRfD values not based on processing factors were 5-10 times more than those based on
processing factors. The value of dietary exposure assessment was more precise by considering the influence of processing
factors on chlorpyrifos in cowpea. All the different cooking modes following cleaning were effective to remove chlorpyrifos
residues from cowpea and microwave cooking showed the best effect.

Key words: cooking, chlorpyrifos, processing factor, dietary exposure assessment, chornic exposure risk index

中图分类号: