食品科学

• 分析检测 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于模糊评判的蜂蜜感官评价及阈值分析

高丽娇,刘佳霖,程 尚*,曹 兰,戴荣国,梁明荣,罗文华,解华东,王瑞生,任 勤,姬聪慧   

  1. 重庆市畜牧科学院,重庆 402460
  • 出版日期:2014-11-25 发布日期:2014-12-09
  • 基金资助:

    重庆市农发资金项目(12411);重庆市基本科研业务费计划项目(2012cstc-jbky-00905);
    国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-45-SYZ 15);荣昌县科委资助项目(2014007)

Sensory Evaluation and Threshold Determination of Honey Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Judgment

GAO Li-jiao, LIU Jia-lin, CHENG Shang*, CAO Lan, DAI Rong-guo, LIANG Ming-rong,  LUO Wen-hua, XIE Hua-dong, WANG Rui-sheng, REN Qin, JI Cong-hui   

  1. Chongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China
  • Online:2014-11-25 Published:2014-12-09

摘要:

为选择合适的蜂蜜作为复合甜味剂,对蜂蜜产品进行感官评价,并确定评价较高蜂蜜的甜度阈值及风味阈值。实验以香气、甜味、综合风味为评价因素,采取模糊评判法对蜂蜜产品进行评价。结果表明:含糖量为质量分数9%的柑橘蜂蜜综合评价最高,其次为质量分数9%的紫云英蜂蜜;柑橘蜂蜜的甜度阈值和风味阈值含糖量分别是质量分数0.75%和0.50%,紫云英蜂蜜为质量分数0.50%和0.50%。可将柑橘蜂蜜和紫云英蜂蜜作为复合甜味剂用于饮料研发中。

关键词: 蜂蜜, 感官评价, 模糊评判, 阈值

Abstract:

In order to select an appropriate honey for use as an ingredient in complex sweeteners, a fuzzy integral evaluation
model was applied for sensory evaluation of honey. The thresholds of sweetness and flavor for honey with high sensory
quality were determined. Three variables including aroma, sweetness and flavor were selected to calculate the weight
coefficient of each factor. The experimental results indicated that the honey with the highest quality score in sensory
evaluation was citrus honey containing 9% sugar, followed by milk vetch honey with a sugar content of 9%. The thresholds
of sweetness and flavor for citrus honey were 0.75% and 0.50%, respectively, and those for milk vetch honey were 0.50%
and 0.50%. Citrus honey and milk vetch honey both can be used in complex sweeteners for beverages.

Key words: honey, sensory evaluation, fuzzy evaluation, threshold

中图分类号: