人参中二氧化硫残留分析与健康风险评估

doi:10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201524040

食品科学

人参中二氧化硫残留分析与健康风险评估

王艳红1，安宇2，张敏1，吴晓民3，任谓明1，许煊炜1，朱艳萍1，赵丹1，李月茹1,*

1.吉林农业大学农业部参茸产品质量监督检验测试中心，吉林长春 130118；
2.吉林农业大学生命科学学院，吉林长春 130118；3.吉林农业大学附属医院，吉林长春 130118

出版日期:2015-12-25 发布日期:2015-12-24
通讯作者: 李月茹
基金资助:
国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目（201310193047）

Analysis and Health Risk Assessment of Sulfur Dioxide Residue in Ginseng Roots

WANG Yanhong1, AN Yu2, ZHANG Min1, WU Xiaomin3, REN Weiming1, XU Xuanwei1, ZHU Yanping1, ZHAO Dan1, LI Yueru1,*

1. Ginseng and Cartialgenous Testing Center, Ministry of Agriculture, Jilin Agriculture University, Changchun 130118, China;
2. College of Life Science, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China;
3. Jilin Agricultural University Affiliated Hospital, Changchun 130118, China

Online:2015-12-25 Published:2015-12-24
Contact: LI Yueru

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

分析不同类型人参中二氧化硫残留状况，并结合分析结果对人参途径摄入的二氧化硫进行健康风险评估。在东北地区不同的人参市场共采集4 种类型80 个人参样品，利用荧光衍生法测定人参中二氧化硫的残留量；采用点评估和基于蒙特卡洛（Monte Carlo）模拟法的概率评估评价人参中二氧化硫的暴露风险水平。结果表明：4 种类型人参中二氧化硫的残留量按我国人参国家标准的限量值50 mg/kg规定，部分样品超出限量值。但不同种类人参二氧化硫含量不同，二氧化硫平均含量顺序为生晒参（89.16 mg/kg）＞保鲜参（62.70 mg/kg）＞红参（45.01 mg/kg）＞人参蜜片（40.94 mg/kg），且生晒参与红参或人参蜜片差异显著。点评估（按平均值估计）结果显示，被调查的居民通过人参途径摄入二氧化硫的日均暴露量分别为1.08×10－2（保鲜参）、8.35×10－3（生晒参）、4.46×10－3 mg/（kg·d）（红参）及2.83×10－3 mg/（kg·d）（人参蜜片），风险系数值均小于1；概率评估结果显示，用来衡量高暴露人群的最高暴露量位点99.5%分位处，保鲜参、生晒参、红参和人参蜜片二氧化硫暴露量分别为0.039 3、0.158 2、0.026 1 mg/（kg·d）和0.019 4 mg/（kg·d），风险系数虽远高于均值，但都远远小于1，表明风险系数虽然增大了，但仍处于安全水平内。可见，现今不同类型人参中二氧化硫的含量对普通人群甚至高危人群均无明显健康风险。

关键词: 人参, 二氧化硫, 蒙特卡洛, 健康风险评估

Abstract:

This study aimed to analyze the status of sulfur dioxide residue in different types of ginseng roots and to
assess the health risk of sulfur dioxide residue based on the obtained data. A total of 80 samples of four types of ginseng
roots were obtained from different ginseng markets in northeast China and prepared for analysis by fluorometry after
derivatization. Exposure assessments of sulfur dioxide residue in ginseng roots were carried out by point assessment and
probabilistic assessment based on Monte Carlo simulation method. The results showed that sulfur dioxide contents of some
samples exceeded the maximum residue level stipulated the Chinese national standard for sulfur dioxide (50 mg/kg). The
average concentrations of sulfur dioxide in four types of ginseng roots were 62.70 mg/kg for preserved fresh ginseng,
89.16 mg/kg for dried raw ginseng, 45.01 mg/kg for red ginseng and 40.94 mg/kg for honeyed ginseng slice, respectively,
indicating a significant difference between dried raw ginseng and red ginseng or honeyed ginseng slice. The point estimation
based on the mean intake and residue showed that the daily exposure to sulfur dioxide due to ginseng consumption of the
investigated inhabitants were 1.08 × 10-2 mg/(kg·d) for preserved fresh ginseng, 8.35 × 10-3 mg/(kg·d) for dried raw ginseng,
4.46 × 10-3 mg/(kg·d) for red ginseng and 2.83 × 10-3 mg/(kg·d) for honeyed ginseng slice, respectively. Their hazard
quotients were all less than one. The results of probabilistic assessment showed that when the highest exposure site (99.5%)
was used to measure the high exposure population, the daily exposure of sulfur dioxide in preserved fresh ginseng, dried
raw ginseng, red ginseng and honeyed ginseng slice were 0.039 3, 0.158 2, 0.026 1 and 0.019 4 mg/(kg·d), respectively.
The hazard quotients were far higher than the average but far lower than one. These results indicated that they were still at
a safe level though their health risks were increased. Thus the levels of sulfur dioxide exposure from ginseng roots might be
acceptable in principle for the general population and even for high-risk populations.

Key words: ginseng, sulfur dioxide, Monte Carlo, health risk assessment

中图分类号:

R155

王艳红，安宇，张敏，吴晓民，任谓明，许煊炜，朱艳萍，赵丹，李月茹. 人参中二氧化硫残留分析与健康风险评估[J]. 食品科学, doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201524040.

WANG Yanhong1, AN Yu2, ZHANG Min1, WU Xiaomin3, REN Weiming1, XU Xuanwei1, ZHU Yanping1, ZHAO Dan1, LI Yueru1,*. Analysis and Health Risk Assessment of Sulfur Dioxide Residue in Ginseng Roots[J]. FOOD SCIENCE, doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201524040.

[1]	顾倩，周静，张建梅，尚志，沈婷，杨晓君，胡卫成. 人参皂苷Rh2-壳聚糖纳米粒子制备及对A549细胞的抑制作用[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(7): 162-168.
[2]	徐艳阳，赵玉娟，高峰，王二雷，鲁海玲，李雪凤，姜雯雯，陈艳. 高效液相色谱法分析中国人参不同部位中多酚类化合物[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(4): 240-246.
[3]	周亚军，王雪松，陈艳，王淑杰. 人参浸提液处理对烧鸡食用品质的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(15): 66-73.
[4]	华梅，樊美玲，李志满，董丽娜，李珊珊，孙印石. 人参水溶性膳食纤维对大鼠糖脂代谢、氧化应激和肠道健康的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(13): 127-135.
[5]	徐明芳，岳甜，傅利军，刘莉，张秀敏，马永征，沈林燕，孙勇. 微波消解-电感耦合等离子体-质谱法同步检测白玉菇中Pb、As、Cd及其健康风险评估[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(24): 333-339.
[6]	王小艺，陈谦，赵峙尧，熊科，史策，裴鹏刚. 基于蒙特卡洛仿真的小麦仓储环节菌落总数风险评估方法[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(23): 166-171.
[7]	李晓贝，赵晓燕，刘海燕，周昌艳，范婷婷，张艳梅. 基于蒙特卡罗模拟技术的食用菌中二氧化硫膳食暴露风险评估[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(12): 298-304.
[8]	陈丽雪，曲迪，华梅，高坤，孙印石. 不同年生和不同部位人参样品有效成分的比较[J]. 食品科学, 2019, 40(8): 124-129.
[9]	王艳红，吴晓民，朱艳萍，赵丹，李月茹. 同时测定不同人参加工产品中20 种人参皂苷的UPLC-PDA方法开发和验证[J]. 食品科学, 2019, 40(6): 253-260.
[10]	刘志，夏娟，李伟，张晶，孙光芝，阮长春. 天冬氨酸降解人参二醇组皂苷及其美拉德反应产物的抗氧化活性[J]. 食品科学, 2018, 39(7): 20-26.
[11]	徐灵均，袁义明，冯爱国，邓健，胡晓苹. 传统红糖与精制赤砂糖理化性质比较[J]. 食品科学, 2018, 39(7): 125-130.
[12]	耿梦梦，徐明芳，王阳，黎明，陈耕南. 基于Monte Carlo模拟法对液态乳中黄曲霉毒素M1的风险评估[J]. 食品科学, 2018, 39(5): 226-233.
[13]	阮晓佳，郜玉钢，赵岩，臧埔，何忠梅，祝洪艳，王立岩，张连学. 不同林型、产地、参龄及坡向对林下参20 种单体皂苷含量的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2018, 39(24): 195-202.
[14]	王璐，郜玉钢，郭阳，刘杨，陈思，臧埔，何忠梅，赵岩，张连学. 培养液匀浆人参发根抗氧化、抗黑色素瘤作用[J]. 食品科学, 2018, 39(17): 152-158.
[15]	苏敏，朴春红，梁德春，初琦，王玉华，王尚，陈月，胡洋，霍越. 产β-葡萄糖苷酶酵母菌的分离鉴定及其在人参皂苷Rg3转化中的应用[J]. 食品科学, 2018, 39(14): 172-178.

人参中二氧化硫残留分析与健康风险评估

Analysis and Health Risk Assessment of Sulfur Dioxide Residue in Ginseng Roots

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价