食品科学

• 营养卫生 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同饲养模式对青海藏羊肉食用品质和营养成分的影响

周玉青1,李 娜2,谢 鹏3,王 欢3,雷元华3,刘 璇3,李海鹏3,保善科1,孙宝忠3,*   

  1. 1.青海海北藏族自治州畜牧兽医科学研究所,青海 海北 810200;2.天津港首农食品进出口贸易有限公司,天津 300456;
    3.中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所,北京 100193
  • 出版日期:2016-10-15 发布日期:2016-12-01

Effects of Different Feeding Patterns on Meat Quality and Nutrition of Tibetan Sheep

ZHOU Yuqing1, LI Na2, XIE Peng3, WANG Huan3, LEI Yuanhua3, LIU Xuan3, LI Haipeng3, BAO Shanke1, SUN Baozhong3,*   

  1. 1. Animal Husbandry and Scientific Research Institute of Qinghai Province, Haibei 810200, China;
    2. Tianjin Port Sunlon Food International Trading Co. Ltd., Tianjin 300456, China;
    3. Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
  • Online:2016-10-15 Published:2016-12-01

摘要:

为了提高青海藏羊养殖效益,取3 种不同饲养模式(放牧组、放牧+补饲组、全舍饲组)的藏羊肉,采用色差仪、酸度计、嫩度仪测定羊肉的色度、pH值和嫩度等食用品质指标,参照国家标准规定方法测定羊肉脂肪、蛋白质、水分等营养成分含量以及重金属、抗生素、农兽药等有害物质残留量。结果表明:3 种饲养模式的羊肉在蒸煮损失方面存在显著差异(P<0.05),全舍饲组羊肉的蒸煮损失率显著低于其他两组,3 种饲养模式的羊肉失水率和剪切力不存在显著差异;全舍饲组羊肉的脂肪含量显著高于其他两组(P<0.05),而水分含量则差异不显著,3 组羊肉的蛋白质含量不存在显著差异;3 种饲养模式羊肉的饱和脂肪酸含量存在显著差异(P<0.05),不饱和脂肪酸含量无显著差异;只有放牧+补饲组的羊肉检出铅含量为0.022 mg/kg,3 种饲养模式下的羊肉均未检出其他有害物质。全舍饲组藏羊肉的加工性能较好,而放牧组藏羊肉的蛋白质含量更高,在生产中应考虑其不同用途从而选择不同饲养模式。

关键词: 藏羊, 饲养模式, 食用品质, 营养特征

Abstract:

In order to improve the breeding efficiency of Qinghai Tibetan sheep, the meat color, pH value, tenderness and
other edible quality indexes of lamb in 3 different feeding patterns (grazing, grazing plus forage supplementation, and
house feeding) were measured by colorimeter, acidity meter and tenderness meter. The contents of fat, protein, moisture
and other harmful substances in the mutton were determined by the national standard methods, and the residues of heavy
metals, antibiotics, agricultural and veterinary drugs were also explored. It was demonstrated that cooking loss rates of lamb
meat from the three feeding patterns were significantly different (P < 0.05), and a significant decrease was observed in the
house feeding group compared with the two other groups. Nonetheless, there was no significant difference in water loss rate
or shearing force among the three groups. The fat content in the house feeding group was significantly increased compared
with that in the two other groups, whereas the difference in moisture content was not significant. Likewise, there was no
significant difference in protein content among these three groups. Moreover, significant difference was observed in saturated
fatty acid contents rather than in unsaturated fatty acid contents. Lead was detected only in the grazing group at a level of
0.022 mg/kg. No other harmful substances were detected in all of these groups. Processing properties of Tibetan sheep in the
house feeding group were better, but higher protein content was found in grazing group. Different uses should be considered
when choosing different feeding patterns in production.

Key words: Tibetan sheep, feeding pattern, meat quality, nutritional characteristics

中图分类号: