我国北方高酸苹果综合品质评价

doi:10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201717006

食品科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (17): 32-35.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201717006

我国北方高酸苹果综合品质评价

李红英1，张磊1,*，张晓煜1，曹宁1，袁海燕2

1.中国气象局旱区特色农业气象灾害监测预警与风险管理重点实验室，宁夏气象防灾减灾重点实验室，宁夏银川 750002；2.宁夏国土资源调查监测院，宁夏银川 750004

出版日期:2017-09-15 发布日期:2017-09-12
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金地区科学基金项目（31160249）

Comprehensive Quality Evaluation of High-Acid Apples in the North of China

LI Hongying1, ZHANG Lei1,*, ZHANG Xiaoyu1, CAO Ning1, YUAN Haiyan2

1. Ningxia Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster Prevention and Reduction, Key Laboratory for Meteorological Disaster Monitoring and Early Warning and Risk Management of Characteristic Agriculture in Arid Regions, China Meteorological Administration, Yinchuan 750002, China; 2. Ningxia Institute of Survey and Monitoring of Land and Resources, Yinchuan 750004, China

Online:2017-09-15 Published:2017-09-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了推动高酸苹果基地合理规划，提高产业竞争力，对我国北方高酸苹果综合品质进行了定量综合评价。基于2011—2014年我国8 省区多点采样检验资料，采用层次分析法和K-均值聚类分析方法，综合高酸苹果榨汁和鲜食两种用途，将可滴定酸、可溶性固形物、VC含量、出汁率等主要品质因子根据生理品质、物理品质和外观品质分为3 类，构建了高酸苹果品质评价指标和评价体系，对各地高酸苹果综合品质进行了评价。结果表明，我国宁夏、辽宁两省区采样点上高酸苹果综合评价等级较高，品质相对较好，陕西、河南两省采样区域高酸苹果品质不稳定，甘肃、山西和山东等省采样点上多数年份高酸苹果综合评价等级偏低，品质一般。2011—2012年各地高酸苹果品质多为良好，2013—2014年各地苹果品质则不稳定。所构建的评价体系能够反映高酸苹果品质地域和年际间的波动，评价结果可为高酸苹果产区结构调整和苹果果汁企业发展提供参考。

关键词: 高酸苹果, 澳洲青苹, 层次分析, 聚类分析, 综合品质评价

Abstract: Quantitative comprehensive quality evaluation of high-acid apple is important to promote the rational planning of apple producing bases and industrial competitiveness. The overall quality of high-acid apples collected from different growing areas in 8 provinces in northern China from the year 2011 to 2014 was quantitatively evaluated. Taking into account that high-acid apple is consumed as a fresh fruit or as a juice, the main quality factors, including titratable acidity, soluble solids content, vitamin C content and juice yield, were divided to three categories: physiological, physical and appearance quality using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and K-means cluster analysis. A system to evaluate the overall quality of high-acid apple based on the selected indicators was established. The results showed that the quality of high-acid apples was relatively higher from Ningxia and Liaoning provinces; the quality of high-acid apples was varied from Shaanxi and Hennan provinces and was general from Gansu, Shanxi and Shandong provinces. The quality of most high-acid apples was good during 2011–2012 and varied during 2013–2014. The developed evaluation system could reflect the regional and inter-annual quality fluctuations of high-acid apple and the evaluation results could provide references for the structural adjustment of high-acid apple producing areas and the development of apple juice enterprises.

Key words: high-acid apple, Granny Smith apples, analytic hierarchy process, cluster analysis, comprehensive evaluation

中图分类号:

S601.9

李红英，张磊，张晓煜，曹宁，袁海燕. 我国北方高酸苹果综合品质评价[J]. 食品科学, 2017, 38(17): 32-35.

LI Hongying, ZHANG Lei, ZHANG Xiaoyu, CAO Ning, YUAN Haiyan. Comprehensive Quality Evaluation of High-Acid Apples in the North of China[J]. FOOD SCIENCE, 2017, 38(17): 32-35.

[1]	蔡玮琦，左雯雯，陆杨，黄胜良，李存玉，郑云枫，彭国平. 红糖、白砂糖、赤砂糖与黑糖的HPLC指纹图谱与化学模式识别[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(6): 250-255.
[2]	王丽艳，荆瑞勇，郭永霞，王鑫淼，赵行健，宋维民，杨佳霓，卫佳琪. 基于氨基酸含量的市售14 种食用蘑菇的综合评价[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(16): 203-208.
[3]	王华杰，滑金杰，余勤艳，江用文，王近近，杨艳芹，邓余良，袁海波. 基于IRAE-HS-SPME/GC-MS分析杀青方式对绿茶栗香形成的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(14): 209-217.
[4]	孔滢，王欢，郎利新，窦晓莹，白锦荣. 不同百合样品中13 种内源性游离糖的含量分析[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(10): 249-254.
[5]	方冠宇，蒋予箭，穆晓静，施思. 浙江玫瑰醋不同发酵阶段特征性香气成分的确定[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(8): 234-242.
[6]	倪德让，叶兴乾，林琳，孙崇德，孔祥礼，王和玉，王莉. 基于多酚类化合物HPLC指纹图谱在红缨子高粱原料品质监控中的应用[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(8): 250-255.
[7]	王乐飞，古绍彬，吴影. 基于UPLC-MS代谢组学技术的枣果皮黄酮类化合物分析[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(24): 155-161.
[8]	贾潜，程超，田成，李伟，周志，莫开菊，汪兴平. 不同处理对糟姜风味成分的影响及风味保真比较[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(24): 172-178.
[9]	荆瑞勇，卫佳琪，王丽艳，宋维民，郑桂萍，郭永霞. 基于主成分分析的不同水稻品种品质综合评价[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(24): 179-184.
[10]	范三红，王娇娇，白宝清，张锦华. 三相盐析萃取分离辣椒红色素和辣椒碱及不同辣椒品种的聚类分析[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(20): 270-277.
[11]	伊丽米努尔，何苗，陆彪，依巴代提·木合旦尔，罗青红. 北疆早、中熟本土苹果品质分析与评价[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(19): 62-67.
[12]	马小卫，苏穆清，李栋梁，郑斌，邹明宏. 杨桃种质果实品质性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(17): 68-74.
[13]	李笑梅, 邢竺静, 赵廉诚, 石彦国, 陈璐, 闫怡宏, 张娜. 基于主成分与聚类分析法的制备豆浆用大豆的品质指标综合评价[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(15): 64-71.
[14]	马文霞, 倪玉洁, 谢倩, 何淑敏, 叶清华, 叶俊, 陈清西. 鲜食百香果果实品质综合评价模型的建立及应用[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(13): 53-60.
[15]	邵航, 宋英华, 李墨潇, 邵伟, 雷生姣, 库任俊, 夏亚琼. 我国食品安全与数据科学交叉研究的科学计量学分析[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(13): 291-301.

我国北方高酸苹果综合品质评价

Comprehensive Quality Evaluation of High-Acid Apples in the North of China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价