食品科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (18): 295-301.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20181010-075

• 工艺技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

响应面法优化酿酒酵母中S-腺苷甲硫氨酸的提取工艺

杜瑾,张晓青,张爱君,司晓光,王树勋,曹军瑞   

  1. (自然资源部天津海水淡化与综合利用研究所,天津 300192)
  • 出版日期:2019-09-25 发布日期:2019-09-23
  • 基金资助:
    海洋公益性行业科研专项(201505032-2);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(K-JBYWF-2017-T08)

Optimization of Extraction Process for S-Adenosyl-L-Methionine from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by Response Surface Methodology

DU Jin, ZHANG Xiaoqing, ZHANG Aijun, SI Xiaoguang, WANG Shuxun, CAO Junrui   

  1. (Institute of Seawater Desalination and Multipurpose Utilization, Ministry of Natural Resources, Tianjin 300192, China)
  • Online:2019-09-25 Published:2019-09-23

摘要: 提取酿酒酵母中S-腺苷甲硫氨酸(S-adenosyl-L-methionine,SAM)的传统工艺多采用高浓度高氯酸或有机溶剂作为提取剂,本研究以较低浓度盐酸为提取液并辅以超声波破碎细胞壁,可降低有机溶剂用量和操作危险性。首先以酿酒酵母干菌体为原料提取胞内SAM,比较高氯酸、乙酸乙酯-硫酸及不同浓度盐酸的提取效果,筛选出最适的提取液,然后通过单因素试验、Plackett-Burman试验、最陡爬坡试验和响应面试验确定超声辅助提取SAM的最佳工艺。结果表明:选取0.01?mol/L盐酸为提取液;各因素对SAM提取量的影响顺序为料液比>超声功率>超声时间>时间间隔;最优工艺条件为超声功率314?W、超声时间4.1?min、料液比1∶27(g/mL),此时SAM提取量为66.56?mg/g,与预测值相差0.98%,SAM提取率可达92.1%。因此,该优化工艺具有实际应用价值。

关键词: S-腺苷甲硫氨酸, 超声法, 响应面分析, 提取工艺优化, 酿酒酵母

Abstract: S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is usually extracted with a high concentration of perchloric acid or organic solvents. In order to reduce the use of organic solvents and potential operating risks during SAM extraction from S. cerevisiae, an ultrasonic-assisted extraction method using a low concentration of hydrochloric acid as the extraction solvent was proposed. First of all, dry yeast cells were used to compare the extraction efficiencies of various solvents including perchloric acid, ethyl acetate-sulfuric acid and hydrochloric acid at different concentrations in an effort to select the most efficient solvent for the extraction of SAM. Subsequently, the extraction process was optimized using one-factor-a-at-a-time method, Plackett-Burman design, steepest ascent design and response surface methodology. The results demonstrated that 0.01 mol/L hydrochloric acid was the solvent of choice. The effects of various factors on extraction efficiency decreased in the descending order of were in the descending order of solid-to-liquid ratio > ultrasonic power > irradiation time > irradiation interval. The optimal conditions obtained were as follows: ultrasonic power, 314 W; irradiation time, 4.1 min; and solid-to-liquid ratio, 1:27 (g/mL). Under the optimized conditions, the experimental extraction yield of SAM was 66.56 mg/g, 92.1% as compared to traditional perchloric acid extraction. The relative deviation between the experimental and predicted values was 0.98%. The optimized extraction procedure is applicable to the production of SAM.

Key words: S-adenosyl-L-methionine, ultrasonic-assisted extraction, response surface methodology, optimization of extraction process, Saccharomyces cerevisiae

中图分类号: