食品科学 ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 17-21.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201305004

• 基础研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

强化面粉用营养素强化剂单体流动性与喷流性评价

解立斌,霍军生*,黄 建   

  1. 中国疾病预防控制中心营养与食品安全所,北京 100050
  • 收稿日期:2012-06-21 修回日期:2013-01-21 出版日期:2013-03-15 发布日期:2013-04-16
  • 通讯作者: 霍军生 E-mail:jshuo@cdc-ffo.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家高技术研究发展计划(863)项目

Evaluation of Flowability and Floodability of Powdery Nutrients Added to Fortified Wheat Flour

XIE Li-bin,HUO Jun-sheng*,HUANG Jian   

  1. National Institute of Nutrition and Food Safety, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China
  • Received:2012-06-21 Revised:2013-01-21 Online:2013-03-15 Published:2013-04-16
  • Contact: HUO Jun-sheng E-mail:jshuo@cdc-ffo.cn

摘要: 为探讨通用强化面粉配方中所涉及营养素单体粉体的流动性与喷流性,采用粉体综合特性测试仪对样品的休止角、崩溃角、差角、平板角、松装密度、振实密度、压缩度、均齐度、分散度等物性指标进行测试计算,参照Carr流动性与喷流性指数表计算出样品的流动性指数及喷流性指数。结果表明:各营养素单体流动性指数最低38、最高90.5,喷流性指数最低35.5、最高67.5,各营养素单体在流动性能与喷流性能上存在较为明显的差异。休止角、压缩度、平板角与流动性指数线性回归相关系数P<0.01,均齐度与流动性指数线性回归相关系数无统计学意义。崩溃角、差角、分散度与喷流性指数相关系数P<0.01,流动性指数与喷流性指数线性回归相关系数无统计学意义。各类营养素单体存在不同程度物性差异,使营养素单体表现出了不同的流动性与喷流性,流动性指数与喷流性指数间并无直接关联。

关键词: 卡尔指数, 流动性, 喷流性, 营养素补充剂

Abstract: This research aimed to evaluate the flowability and floodability of several powdery nutrients used in wheat flour fortification. The angle of repose, angle of fall, angle of difference, angle of spatula, aerated bulk density, packed bulk density, compressibility, uniformity coefficient and dispersibility of powdery nutrients samples were determined using a bulk powders characterization tester (BT-1000) and their flowability and floodability indices were calculated with reference to the table of Carr’s flowability index and Carr’s floodability index to range from 38 to 90.5 and from 35.5 to 67.5, respectively, with apparent differences. A significant linear correlation between flowability index and angle of repose, compressibility or angle of spatula (P<0.01) was found, although flowability index did not show a significant statistical relationship with uniformity coefficient; similarly, there was a significant correlation between floodability index and angle of fall, angle of difference and dispersibility (P<0.01) despite no significant statistical relationship between flowability index and floodability index. All investigated nutrients revealed differences in flowability and floodability because of the differences in physical properties and no direct association between both parameters.

Key words: Carr’s index, flowability, floodability, nutritional fortifier

中图分类号: