食品科学

• 专题论述 • 上一篇    下一篇

感官评价小组及成员排序能力评估的一般导则

史波林,赵 镭,奂 畅,汪厚银,支瑞聪,苏玉芳,解 楠,李 志,张璐璐   

  1. 1.中国标准化研究院食品与农业标准化研究所,北京 100191;2.上海大学计算机工程与科学学院,上海 200444;
    3.内蒙古伊利实业集团股份有限公司技术中心,内蒙古 呼和浩特 010110
  • 出版日期:2014-09-15 发布日期:2014-09-12

General Guidance for Performance Evaluation of Sensory Ranking Panels and Panelists

SHI Bo-lin, ZHAO Lei, HUAN Chang, WANG Hou-yin, ZHI Rui-cong, SU Yu-fang, XIE Nan, LI Zhi, ZHANG Lu-lu   

  1. 1. Food and Agriculture Standardization Institute, China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing 100191, China;
    2. School of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China;
    3. Technology Center, Inner Mongolia YiLi Industrial Group Co. Ltd., Hohhot 010110, China
  • Online:2014-09-15 Published:2014-09-12

摘要:

针对感官评价小组及成员排序能力的评估,提出重复性、再现性与一致性的评估指标。分析了排序实验样品种类、样品间差异程度及样品个数对感官分析仪器性能评估的重要性。确定了以样品间的排列秩次作为能力评估统计的基础数据形式。排序能力评估中,对于无理论顺序样品,通过剔除重复性与再现性异常评价员结果后,采用Friedman检验结合最小显著性差(least significant difference,LSD)确定实验样品的最优估计顺序。文章重点分析用于双变量的Spearman秩相关及用于多变量的Kendall和谐系数,在评价小组及评价员的重复性、再现性与一致性等性能评估中的具体技术应用方法与理论分析。为感官评价小组及成员排序能力评估提出了良好操作示范,也为不同感官实验室评价小组间比对提供了理论基础。既有利于评价小组及成员的长期监测,也有利于感官分析实验室的良好管理能力。

关键词: 感官分析, 排序法, 评价小组及评价员, 能力评估

Abstract:

Repeatability, reproducibility and consistency are considered as the indexes for the ranking capability of panels
and panelists for sensory evaluation. The type, difference and number of samples are very important in ranking performance
measurement. Rank is identified as the basic data style to evaluate the ranking capability. If the order of samples is unknown,
the optimal evaluation order should be firstly confirmed by the methods combining Friedman test and least significant
difference (LSD) after unsuitable panelists who have less repeatability and reproducibility are rejected. This paper was focused
on the application approach of the two-variable Spearman rank correlation and Kendall coefficient of concordance for multiple
variables in evaluating the repeatability, reproducibility, consistency of panels and panelists. Meanwhile, a good manufacturing
practice to evaluate the ranking capability of panels and panelists has been established, which will provide a theoretical
foundation for proficiency testing of sensory ranking panels from different laboratories. It is not only helpful for monitoring the
performance of panels and panelists, but also for improving management capacity of sensory evaluation laboratories.

Key words: sensory analysis, ranking, panels and panelists, performance evaluation

中图分类号: