食品科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (13): 334-286.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20250112-085

• 安全检测 • 上一篇    

米酒加工过程对手性农药己唑醇残留量的影响及其膳食暴露风险

张金旭,王敏,杨天明,庞俊晓,王泽兰,孙大利   

  1. (1.贵州医科大学公共卫生与健康学院,贵州 贵阳 561113;2.贵阳学院食品科学与工程学院,贵州 贵阳 550005)
  • 发布日期:2025-06-13
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金地区科学基金项目(22266011);贵州省基础研究(自然科学)项目(黔科合基础-ZK[2023]289); 中央支持地方高校改革发展资金项目(黔教技[2023]067号)

Effect of Rice Wine Processing on the Residue of the Chiral Pesticide Hexaconazole and Its Dietary Exposure Risk

ZHANG Jinxu, WANG Min, YANG Tianming, PANG Junxiao, WANG Zelan, SUN Dali   

  1. (1. School of Public Health, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 561113, China; 2. School of Food Science and Engineering, Guiyang University, Guiyang 550005, China)
  • Published:2025-06-13

摘要: 为探讨米酒加工过程对手性农药己唑醇的残留变化情况及其健康风险的影响,采集米酒加工各环节中7 种样品(稻谷、稻壳、糙米、精米、浸泡米、米饭和米酒),利用液相色谱-串联质谱(liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry,LC-MS/MS)测定己唑醇对映体的残留水平,通过膳食风险评估模型对各加工环节中己唑醇对映体的膳食风险进行评估。结果表明,(+)-己唑醇和(-)-己唑醇在7 种稻米样品中添加回收率分别为88.2%~105.7%和85.3%~104.3%,相对标准偏差范围分别为0.8%~8.3%和0.6%~9.6%。脱壳、去糊粉层、浸泡、蒸煮等过程均降低了稻米中己唑醇残留水平,(+)-己唑醇和(-)-己唑醇的含量分别从10.64 mg/kg和10.10 mg/kg均降至0.13 mg/kg,4 种加工步骤的加工因子(processing factor,PF)分别为0.94、0.45、0.06、0.50和0.93、0.41、0.06、0.52,对映体分数(enantiomeric fraction,EF)值在0.5上下波动。这些结果表明,在米酒加工过程中,己唑醇浓度逐渐降低,两个对映体的降解率无显著差异性。但在发酵过程中,(+)-己唑醇和(-)-己唑醇的含量从0.13 mg/kg升至0.80 mg/kg和0.66 mg/kg,PF>1,EF值为0.55,说明米酒发酵过程使得己唑醇含量选择性升高,且(+)-己唑醇含量大于(-)-己唑醇。膳食风险评估结果显示,稻谷和糙米中(+)-己唑醇和(-)-己唑醇的慢性风险商大于100%,去糊粉层处理后其膳食风险降低到可接受水平,分别为6.2%和5.2%。本研究结果为米酒加工过程中手性农药己唑醇的膳食健康风险评估提供了依据。

关键词: 米酒加工;己唑醇;加工因子;膳食暴露评估

Abstract: In order to investigate the effect of rice wine processing on the residue of the chiral pesticide hexaconazole and evaluate its health risk, samples were collected at different stages of rice wine processing (paddy, rice hulls, brown rice, polished rice, soaked rice, cooked rice, and rice wine) and the residue levels of hexaconazole enantiomers in these samples were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Risk assessment models were used to evaluate the risk of dietary exposure to hexaconazole enantiomers. The results showed that the recoveries of (+)-hexaconazole and (-)-hexaconazole spiked into the seven samples were in the range of 88.2%–105.7% and 85.3%–104.3% with relative standard deviations (RSD) of 0.8%–8.3% and 0.6%–9.6%, respectively. The processes of dehulling, aleurone layer removal, washing, soaking, and cooking all significantly reduced hexaconazole residues, and the contents of (+)-hexaconazole and (-)-hexaconazole reduced from 10.64 and 10.10 to 0.13 mg/kg with processing factor (PF) of 0.94, 0.45, 0.06, 0.50 and 0.93, 0.41, 0.06, 0.52, respectively and enantiomeric fraction (EF) values of about 0.5, indicating that the concentration of hexaconazole gradually reduced during the processing of rice wine with no significant differences being observed between the two enantiomers. However, during the fermentation process, the contents of (+)-hexaconazole and (-)-hexaconazole increased selectively from 0.13 to 0.80 and 0.66 mg/kg with PF > 1 and EF value of 0.55, respectively. This indicated that the fermentation process of rice wine selectively increased the content of hexazolol, and the content of (+)-hexazolol was greater than that of (-)-hexazolol. The dietary risk assessment results showed that the chronic risk quotients (CRQ) of (+)-hexaconazole and (-)-hexaconazole in paddy and brown rice were both greater than 100%, which decreased to acceptable levels of 6.2% and 5.2%, respectively after aleurone layer removal. The results of this study provide a basis for the dietary risk assessment of the chiral pesticide hexaconazole in rice wine processing.

Key words: rice wine processing; hexaconazole; processing factor; dietary exposure assessment

中图分类号: