食品科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 279-286.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20210429-417

• 成分分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于GC-IMS结合多元统计方法分析炸制时间对花椒调味油挥发性物质的影响

倪瑞洁,詹萍,田洪磊   

  1. (1.陕西师范大学食品工程与营养科学学院,陕西西安 710119;2.石河子大学食品学院,新疆石河子 832000)
  • 出版日期:2022-03-25 发布日期:2022-03-28
  • 基金资助:
    “十三五”国家重点研发计划重点专项(2016YFD0400705)

Effects of Frying Time on Volatile Flavor Compounds in Fried Pepper (Zanthoxylum bungeanum) Oil as Analyzed by Gas Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectrometry and Multivariate Statistical Analysis

NI Ruijie, ZHAN Ping, TIAN Honglei   

  1. (1. College of Food Engineering and Nutritional Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China; 2. School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China)
  • Online:2022-03-25 Published:2022-03-28

摘要: 为研究不同炸制时间对花椒调味油(fried hancheng pepper oil,HPO)香气的影响,以韩城大红袍花椒为原材料,菜籽油为载体油脂,在130?℃条件下分别炸制5、15、25?min和35?min制得花椒调味油,采用描述性感官分析(descriptive sensory analysis,DSA)、电子鼻和气相离子迁移谱(gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry,GC-IMS)技术对比分析4 个HPO样品的挥发性成分差异,并结合多元统计分析探究4 个花椒调味油之间的标志性差异物。DSA和电子鼻结果表明4?个HPO之间差异显著,其中HPO2表现出最强的草药味、柠檬香和松木香,脂肪香和青香适中,有很弱的焦糊味;经GC-IMS共分离鉴定出46?种化合物,包括醛类19?种、萜烯类15?种、醇类8?种、酯类3?种和酮类化合物1?种;随着炸制时间的延长,4?个花椒调味油中的挥发性化合物种类相似,但峰值强度存在显著差异,其中醛类包括己醛、庚醛、(E)-2-庚醛等的含量呈上升趋势,α-萜品烯、水芹烯、4-萜烯醇、3-甲基丁酸乙酯和乙缩醛等的含量呈先上升后下降趋势,醇类、酯类的含量随炸制时间的延长先下降后上升,萜烯类化合物含量变化不大。主成分分析将HPO1、HPO2归为1?组,HPO3、HPO4归为另1?组,与电子鼻中线性判别分析的结果一致;通过偏最小二乘判别分析发现柠檬烯、α-水芹烯、乙缩醛、α-松油烯、3-甲基丁酸乙酯等物质是HPO2(15?min)的特征香气物质,并且筛选出20?种标志性差异物,包括芳樟醇、β-蒎烯、α-蒎烯、柠檬烯、α-水芹烯、己醛、庚醛、(E)-2-己醛等。

关键词: 花椒调味油;电子鼻;挥发性化合物;气相离子迁移谱;偏最小二乘判别分析

Abstract: In order to investigate the effect of frying time on the aroma of fried Hancheng pepper oil (HPO), four HPOs (HPOs 1, 2, 3 and 4) were prepared by frying Dahongpao pepper at 130 ℃ for 5, 15, 25 and 35 minutes with rapeseed oil as the carrier oil, respectively. Descriptive sensory analysis (DSA), an electronic nose (E-nose) system and gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS) were employed to compare and analyze the volatile flavor compounds of the HPOs, and multivariate statistical analysis was used to explore differential volatile compounds between these four HPOs. Both DSA and E-nose results indicated that significant differences were observed between the HPOs; among them, HPO2 showed very strong herbal, lemon-like and pine-like aromas, with moderate fatty and green attributes and a very weak burnt. A total of 46 volatile compounds, including 19 aldehydes, 15 terpenes, 8 alcohols, 3 esters and 1 ketone, were identified from the four HPOs by GC-IMS. The types of volatile compounds in the HPOs were similar, in spite of significant differences in peak intensities. The contents of aldehydes including hexanal, heptanal and (E)-2-heptanal showed an increasing trend with increasing frying time; the contents of α-terpinene, phellandrene, 4-terpineol, ethyl 3-methylbutyrate and acetal showed an increasing and then decreasing trend, while a reverse trend was observed for alcohols and esters; however, the contents of terpenoids did not change so much. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that the four HPOs were classified into two groups; one group contained HPO1 and HPO2, and another group contained HPO3 and HPO4, which was consistent with the results of linear discriminant analysis (LDA) from the E-nose data. The results of partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) showed that limonene, α-phellandrene, acetal, α-pinene and ethyl 3-methylbutyrate were the characteristic aroma compounds of HPO2, and 20 compounds were identified as differential markers, mainly including linalool, β-pinene, α-pinene, limonene, α-phellandrene, hexanal, heptanal, (E)-2-hexanal, (E)-2-heptenal, furfural, 2-methylbutanal, methylpropanal, 2-propenal, 1-propanol and ethyl-3-methylbutanoate.

Key words: fried pepper (Zanthoxylum bungeanum) oil; electronic nose; volatile flavor compounds; gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry; partial least squares-discriminant analysis

中图分类号: