食品科学

• •    下一篇

基于化学计量学鉴定不同甜橙精油挥发性成分

刘菲斐,陈晋,陈健乐,刘东红,叶兴乾,程焕   

  1. 浙江大学生物系统工程与食品科学学院
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-08 修回日期:2023-10-09 出版日期:2023-10-20 发布日期:2023-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 程焕
  • 基金资助:
    血橙花色苷采后调控对其风味劣变的抑制机理研究

Identification of Volatiles in Different Sweet Orange Essential Oils by Chemometrics

Fei-Fei LIU 2, 2,Donghong LIU2,Ye Xingqian2,Huan 无CHENG   

  • Received:2023-08-08 Revised:2023-10-09 Online:2023-10-20 Published:2023-10-20
  • Contact: Huan 无CHENG
  • Supported by:
    Inhibition mechanism of post-harvest regulation of anthocyanin on flavor deterioration in blood oranges

摘要: 不同提取方式导致精油风味成分差异,进而影响其功效。本文采用感官定量描述分析、气相离子迁移色谱(gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry,GC-IMS)及超快速气相电子鼻并结合化学计量学,对冷压法(cold pressing,CP)、微波辅助水蒸气蒸馏法(microwave-assisted hydrodistillation,MADH)和旋转锥蒸馏塔法(spinning cone column,SCC)等不同方法提取的甜橙(血橙和脐橙为代表)精油进行挥发性成分差异分析。结果表明,三种方式提取的甜橙精油风味存在明显差异,CP精油喜爱度最高且具有更强的果香、甜香和花香,MADH精油具有更强的脂香、青香和木香,而SCC萃取液香气浓度较低。GC-IMS一共鉴定出64种挥发性化合物,主要为萜烯类、醇类和醛类,其次是酸类、酯类和其他化合物。指纹图谱直观地展示出不同样品的成分差异,萜烯类在CP和MADH精油中含量明显高于SCC萃取液,而醇类和醛类在MADH精油和SCC萃取液中含量明显高于CP精油。基于相对气味活性值(relative odor activity value,ROAV)鉴定出β-月桂烯和芳樟醇是甜橙精油风味的主要贡献者。GC-IMS结合偏最小二乘法判别分析(partial least square discriminant analysis,PLS-DA)和变量重要性投影(variable importance in projection,VIP)筛选出15种区分六种精油的标志性差异挥发性化合物。此外,超快速气相电子鼻结合主成分分析(principal component analysis,PCA)和判别因子分析(discriminant factor analysis,DFA)也能够成功区分六种甜橙精油挥发物差异。本研究为甜橙精油的提取及应用提供数据支撑。

关键词: 脐橙, 血橙, 精油, 挥发性化合物, 化学计量学

Abstract: he extraction methods affect the flavor components of essential oils, thereby affect their efficacy. Sensory quantitative description analysis, gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS) and Heracles NEO e-nose combined with chemometrics were used to investigate the volatile compounds of different sweet orange essential oils (EOs). The EOs from blood orange and navel orange were extracted by three extraction methods, i.e. cold pressing (CP), microwave-assisted hydrodistillation (MADH) and spinning cone column (SCC). The results indicated that the extraction method greatly influenced the flavor profiles and aroma compounds of EOs. CP EOs exhibited the strongest fruity, sweet and floral aroma with the highest preference, MADH EOs had strongest fatty, green and woody aroma, and SCC extract had a low aroma intensity. A total of 64 volatiles were identified by GC-IMS, primarily terpenes, alcohols and aldehydes, followed by acids, esters and other compounds. The fingerprint directly highlighted the composition variations among six samples. The contents of terpenes were significantly higher in CP and MADH EOs compared to SCC extracts, whereas the contents of alcohols and aldehydes were significantly higher in MADH EOs and SCC extracts compared to CP EOs. Based on relative odor activity value (ROAV), β-myrcene and linalool were identified as the main contributors to the flavor of sweet orange EOs. Moreover, GC-IMS combined with partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and variable importance in projection (VIP) screened out 15 aroma markers that distinguish six EOs. Additionally, the e-nose combined with principal component analysis (PCA) and discriminant factor analysis (DFA) also successfully distinguished the six EOs. This study provides data support for the extraction and application of sweet orange EOs.

Key words: navel orange, blood orange, essential oil, volatile compounds, chemometrics

中图分类号: