食品科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 325-334.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20250828-190

• 安全检测 • 上一篇    

基于氨基酸指纹的奶茶粉和传统奶酪真实性模型建立

叶乐,古斯愣图,刘建林,张利妹,刘雨佳,郭军   

  1. (内蒙古农业大学食品科学与工程学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特 010018)
  • 发布日期:2026-04-14
  • 基金资助:
    内蒙古自治区自然科学基金项目(2023LHMS03043)

Modeling for the Classification of Milk Tea Powder and Authenticity Assessment of Traditional Cheese Based on Amino Acid Fingerprint

YE Le, Gusilengtu, LIU Jianlin, ZHANG Limei, LIU Yujia, GUO Jun   

  1. (College of Food Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China)
  • Published:2026-04-14

摘要: 本研究共采集内蒙古市售奶茶粉138 份,以工艺和主要原料划分为生牛乳奶茶粉(湿法)和现代奶茶粉(干法);内蒙古不同盟市传统奶酪40 份,呼和浩特市售含乳固态制品15 份;另采集对照样本生牛乳、牛乳酪蛋白(不计入总数)、奶粉和豆腐各5 份。通过国标法测定18 种氨基酸(amino acids,AAs),并进行正交偏最小二乘判别分析(orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis,OPLS-DA)和层次聚类分析(hierarchical cluster analysis,HCA)。结果表明,湿法与干法奶茶粉、传统奶酪与含乳固态制品间AAs含量和指纹差异大。OPLS-DA图谱显示,生牛乳奶茶粉(湿法)与现代奶茶粉(干法)、传统奶酪与含乳固态制品都聚类间显著分离;而生牛乳奶茶粉(湿法)和传统奶酪与生牛乳、牛乳酪蛋白、奶粉等对照样品聚类接近;豆腐远离所有其他样品单独聚类,说明研究样本无使用大豆原料现象。奶茶粉AAs绝对和相对含量OPLS-DA判别模型外部验证准确率分别为70.8%和75.4%;传统奶酪AAs绝对和相对含量OPLS-DA判别模型外部验证准确率分别为75.8%和95.0%;进一步证明以AAs指纹判别奶茶粉类别和传统奶酪真实性具有可行性。

关键词: 奶茶粉;传统奶酪;含乳固态制品;氨基酸;真实性判别

Abstract: In this study, a total of 138 milk tea powder samples were collected from the market of Inner Mongolia and classified into two categories based on the manufacturing process and major raw materials: traditional wet-processed and modern dry-mixed powder. In addition, 40 traditional cheese samples and 15 solid milk-containing cheese-like product samples were obtained from Inner Mongolia’s different regions. For comparison, five samples of raw milk, milk casein (not included in the total), milk powder, and tofu were also collected. Eighteen amino acids (AAs) were quantified using the national standard method and subjected to statistical analyses using orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA). Results revealed significant differences in AA contents and fingerprint patterns between the two kinds of milk tea powder, as well as between traditional cheese and solid milk-containing products. OPLS-DA clearly differentiated between wet- and dry-processed milk tea powder, and between traditional cheese and solid milk-containing products. Notably, however, raw milk-derived milk tea powder and traditional cheese were closely clustered with the control samples (raw milk, milk casein, and milk powder). Tofu samples were clustered separately and distinctly from all other groups, indicating no incorporation of soybean-derived ingredients. External validation accuracies for the OPLS-DA models based on the absolute and relative contents of AAs in milk tea powder were 70.8% and 75.4%, respectively, and those for traditional cheese were 75.8% and 95.0%, respectively. These findings confirm the feasibility of authenticating milk tea powder and traditional cheese using AA fingerprints.

Key words: milk tea powder; traditional cheese; solid milk-containing products; amino acids; authentication

中图分类号: