食品科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10): 217-227.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20251110-069

• 成分分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于有机酸、氨基酸和风味物质探究泸州4 种龙眼的酿酒特性

边名鸿,李少龙,蓝海波,李景明,许强,方裕理,吴轩,陈玉杰,苟发源,韩保林   

  1. (1.四川轻化工大学食品与酿酒工程学院,四川 宜宾 644000;2.酿酒科学与技术四川省重点实验室,四川 自贡 643000;3.泸州市农业科学研究院,四川 泸州 646000;4.四川郎酒集团责任有限公司,四川 泸州 646500)
  • 出版日期:2026-05-25 发布日期:2026-06-10
  • 基金资助:
    四川省南亚作物创新团队项目(SCCXTD-2025-6);阿坝州科技计划项目(R24YYJSYJ0014); 现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金项目(CARS-33)

Winemaking Characteristics of Four Longan Varieties from Luzhou Based on Organic Acids, Amino Acids and Flavor Compounds

BIAN Minghong, LI Shaolong, LAN Haibo, LI Jingming, XU Qiang, FANG Yuli, WU Xuan, CHEN Yujie, GOU Fayuan, HAN Baolin   

  1. (1. School of Food and Liquor Engineering, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Yibin 644000, China; 2. Brewing Science and Technology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Zigong 643000, China; 3. Luzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Luzhou 646000, China; 4. Sichuan Langjiu Group Co., Ltd., Luzhou 646500, China)
  • Online:2026-05-25 Published:2026-06-10

摘要: 为开发药食同源资源以推动水果深加工产业发展,本研究对4 个川内常见龙眼品种(立冬本、凤梨穗、石硖、榕育)的酿酒特性进行分析。通过测定不同龙眼品种发酵过程中的基础理化指标、有机酸及氨基酸组成,并分析其成品酒的风味物质、电子鼻响应特征与感官品质,探究各品种发酵特性与成品酒品质差异。结果显示,不同龙眼品种在发酵特性与成品酒品质上差异明显。发酵特性方面,石硖品种表现较为突出,其乙醇生成量最高,有机酸含量适中,氨基酸消耗幅度较大。成品酒品质方面,立冬本果酒有机酸含量较高,酒体有较强烈的酸味特征;榕育果酒鲜味、甜味氨基酸含量较丰富,在鲜甜味感上更有优势。4 种果酒中共检出246 种挥发性化合物,气味活性值(odor activity value,OAV)>1的挥发性物质29 种,其中OAV>1的共有成分为苯乙醇、1-戊醇、乙酸乙酯、辛酸乙酯、癸酸乙酯、水杨酸甲酯、乙酸苯乙酯、辛酸,赋予了酒体果香与花香;石硖果酒的醇类、酯类质量浓度显著高于其他品种(P<0.05)。电子鼻分析表明,不同龙眼果酒在S1(氨、胺类)、S4(乙醇、有机溶剂)、S10(烷烃、可燃气体)和S11(芳香族化合物)传感器响应值差异显著(P<0.05)。感官评价中,石硖果酒总分最高,且酒香与果香表现突出。相关性分析表明,酯类含量、挥发性物质总量与香气特征呈显著正相关(P<0.05)。本研究证实石硖龙眼具有优良的酿酒特性,可为药食同源资源在果酒领域的高值化应用提供参考。

关键词: 龙眼;酿酒;有机酸;氨基酸;风味物质;电子鼻;相关性分析

Abstract: This study investigated the winemaking characteristics of four common longan varieties (Shixia (SX), Lidongben (LDB), Rongyu (RY), and Fenglisui (FLS)) in Luzhou, Sichuan province, aiming to facilitate the utilization of medicinal and culinary resources and advance the development of the fruit deep-processing industry. By determining basic physicochemical indicators, organic acid contents and amino acid profiles during fermentation, as well as volatile flavor compounds, electronic nose (E-nose) response patterns, and sensory attributes of the finished wine, we found significant varietal differences in fermentation characteristics and final product quality. SX exhibited superior fermentation performance, with the highest ethanol production, moderate organic acid levels, and significant amino acid utilization. In terms of product quality, LDB wine contained higher organic acid contents, conferring it a more pronounced sour note, while RY wine was rich in umami and sweet amino acids, contributing to its umami and sweet flavor profile. A total of 246 volatile compounds were identified across all wine samples, among which 29 had an odor activity value (OAV) > 1, including phenethyl alcohol, 1-pentanol, ethyl acetate, ethyl octanoate, ethyl decanoate, methyl salicylate, phenethyl acetate, and octanoic acid. These compounds, collectively imparting fruity and floral aromas, were common to all varieties. Notably, Shixia wine exhibited significantly higher concentrations of alcohols and esters compared with the other varieties (P < 0.05). E-nose analysis demonstrated significant differences in sensor responses for S1 (ammonia and amines), S4 (alcohols and organic solvents), S10 (alkanes and combustible gases), and S11 (aromatic compounds) among the four varieties (P < 0.05). In sensory evaluation, Shixia wine achieved the highest overall score, with prominent wine-like and fruity aromas. Correlation analysis showed significant positive correlations between the contents of esters and total volatile substances and aroma characteristics (P < 0.05). This study validates the superior winemaking potential of the Shixia longan variety, offering insights for the high-value utilization of medicinal and culinary resources in fruit wine production.

Key words: longan; winemaking; organic acids; amino acids; flavor compounds; electronic nose; correlation analysis

中图分类号: