食品科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 31-40.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20220106-050

• 基础研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

麦麸品种与提取方式对阿拉伯木聚糖结构及抗氧化性的影响

张秀敏,周增超,乔晋丽,王昌禄,王玉玲,欧行奇,郭庆彬   

  1. (1.天津科技大学食品科学与工程学院,天津 300457;2.河南科技学院生命科技学院,河南?新乡 453003)
  • 出版日期:2023-02-15 发布日期:2023-02-28
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(32072173)

Effects of Wheat Bran Varieties and Extraction Methods on the Structure and Antioxidant Activity of Arabinoxylan

ZHANG Xiumin, ZHOU Zengchao, QIAO Jinli, WANG Changlu, WANG Yuling, OU Xingqi, GUO Qingbin   

  1. (1. College of Food Science and Engineering, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin 300457, China;2. College of Life Science and Technology, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China)
  • Online:2023-02-15 Published:2023-02-28

摘要: 目的:利用不同方式提取不同品种小麦麸皮中的阿拉伯木聚糖(arabinoxylan,AX),对提取的AX进行结构表征并比较其抗氧化性。方法:分别利用碱提、超声辅助木聚糖酶提和超声辅助纤维素酶提法从不同品种小麦麸皮(‘百农207’‘百旱207’‘冠麦1号’‘华育198’和‘华育166’)中提取AX,测定其化学组成,对比其分子质量、分子结构、热稳定性及抗氧化性能。结果:3 种提取方式中,碱提法得率较高,且总糖质量分数较高;酶提法则能更大程度地保留多酚,这可能是酶提AX抗氧化性较好的原因,但在一定程度上降低了AX的分子质量,且酶提AX单糖组分比例与碱提AX差异较大,糖苷键连接方式也更复杂;两种酶提法相比,超声辅助木聚糖酶提AX得率和总糖质量分数更高,但超声辅助纤维素酶提AX多酚质量分数更高,且二者单糖比例及糖苷键连接方式也不同;此外,不同品种麸皮AX的分子质量、单糖比例、糖苷键连接方式及比例不同。结论:碱提、超声辅助木聚糖酶提和超声辅助纤维素酶提3 种方法从小麦麸皮中提取得到的AX结构及活性存在明显差异,酶提法相对碱提法AX得率和分子质量较低,但多酚含量较高、抗氧化性能较好;超声辅助木聚糖酶提较超声辅助纤维素酶提AX得率和总糖含量更高,但多酚含量较低;不同提取方式以及不同品种小麦麸皮AX结构存在差异。

关键词: 阿拉伯木聚糖;碱提法;超声辅助酶提法;结构表征;抗氧化性

Abstract: Purpose: To compare the structure and antioxidant activity of arabinoxylan (AX) extracted from wheat bran of different varieties by different methods. Methods: AX was extracted from wheat bran from the cultivars ‘Bainong 207’, ‘Baihan 207’, ‘Guanmai 1’, ‘Huayu 198’ and ‘Huayu 166’ by alkali extraction, ultrasonic-assisted xylanase extraction or ultrasonic-assisted cellulase extraction, and its chemical composition, relative molecular mass, molecular structure, thermal stability and antioxidant activity were determined. Results: Among the three extraction methods, alkali extraction gave higher levels of AX yield and total sugar content, while enzymatic extraction retained polyphenols to a greater extent, which may contribute to the better antioxidant capacity of the AX-rich extract, but reduced the relative molecular mass of AX to a certain extent. The monosaccharide composition of enzymatically extracted AX was significantly different from that of alkali extracted AX, and the glycosidic linkage types in enzymatically extracted AX were more complex. Compared with ultrasonic-assisted cellulase extraction, higher AX yield and total sugar content were obtained using ultrasound-assisted xylanase, while the polyphenol content of AX obtained by ultrasound-assisted cellulase extraction was higher, and monosaccharide composition and glycosidic linkage types were also different between AXs extracted by the two enzymatic methods. In addition, the relative molecular mass, the monosaccharide composition, and the types and proportions of glycosidic linkage of AX extracted from wheat bran of different varieties were different. Conclusion: The structure and activity of AX extracted from wheat bran by alkali extraction, ultrasonic-assisted xylanase extraction and ultrasonic-assisted cellulase extraction were obviously different. Compared with alkali extraction, AX obtained by enzymatic extraction had lower yield and molecular mass, but higher polyphenol content and better antioxidant performance. Compared with ultrasound-assisted cellulase extraction, AX obtained by ultrasound-assisted xylanase extraction had higher yield and total sugar content, but lower polyphenol content. The structure of wheat bran AX varied with different extraction methods and varieties.

Key words: arabinoxylan; alkali extraction; ultrasound-assisted enzymatic extraction; structural characterization; antioxidant property

中图分类号: