食品科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11): 269-280.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20220505-046

• 专题论述 • 上一篇    

非法添加类食品安全犯罪刑事规制体系的不足与完善——以法释〔2021〕24号司法解释为视角

魏麟,李春雷   

  1. (中国人民公安大学犯罪学学院,北京 100038)
  • 发布日期:2023-06-30
  • 基金资助:
    “十三五”国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC1602700)

Deficiency and Perfection of Criminal Regulation System for Food Safety Crimes Related to Illegal Addition: from the Perspective of Judicial Interpretation No. 24[2021] of the Supreme People’s Court

WEI Lin, LI Chunlei   

  1. (School of Criminology, People’s Public Security University of China, Beijing 100038, China)
  • Published:2023-06-30

摘要: 非法添加历来是食品安全犯罪治理中的疑难点。当前非法添加类犯罪案件具有案发数量高、危害对象广泛、添加物质种类繁杂的特点。按照非法添加行为的表现形式与危害性质,可将其划分为“禁止添加类”与“限制添加类”两类。法释〔2021〕24号司法解释对非法添加类犯罪刑事规制体系进行了一定的调整,传递出科学规制、精准打击的理念。但当前非法添加类犯罪刑事规制体系仍然存在刑事入罪标准不明、罪名适用规则不统一的问题。对此,在行政与刑事规制之间,应当打破科技标准与法律规范的壁垒,参鉴科学研究作出法律拟制,在当前司法解释仅定性的基础上以定量方式明确划定行政与刑事规制的界限;在刑事规制界域内,应基于刑法第一百四十条、一百四十三条和一百四十四条之间的层次性、竞合性与包容性,进一步明确“限制添加类”“禁止添加类”及“所涉非法添加物毒害性尚不明确类”案件的法律适用逻辑与规则。

关键词: 非法添加;司法解释;危害食品安全犯罪;刑事规制

Abstract: Illegal addition has always been a difficult point in the governance of food safety crimes. At present, there has been a high number of criminal cases related to illegal addition, which involve a wide range of criminal objects and a wide variety of additives. According to its manifestation and harmfulness, illegal addition can be divided into ‘prohibited addition’ and ‘restricted addition’. The judicial interpretation No. 24[2021] of the Supreme People’s Court has improved the criminal regulation system for crimes related to illegal food additives, transmitting the concept of scientific regulation and precision crackdown. However, there are still some problems, such as unclear standards for criminal conviction and inconsistent rules for the application of criminal charges. Therefore, we should break the barriers of scientific and technological standards and legal norms between administrative and criminal regulation, make legal fictions based on scientific research, and clearly delimit the boundary between administrative and criminal regulation in a quantitative way on the basis of the fact that the current judicial interpretation is only qualitative. In addition, in the field of criminal regulation, based on the hierarchy, overlap and inclusiveness between articles 140, 143 and 144 of the criminal law, we should further clarify the legal application logic and rules of ‘restricted addition’ and ‘prohibited addition’ cases, as well as cases involving illegal additives whose toxicity is not clear yet.

Key words: illegal addition; judicial interpretation; food safety crimes; criminal regulation

中图分类号: