食品科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 204-213.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20240620-139

• 包装贮运 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同栽培模式对韭菜采后贮藏品质及风味影响

周新原,陶杰杰,刘明池,左进华,武占会,郑鄢燕,康欣娜,梁浩,牟建楼,陈婕,季延海   

  1. (1.北京市农林科学院蔬菜研究所,农产品加工与食品营养研究所,北京 100097;2.国家蔬菜工程技术研究中心,北京 100097;3.农业农村部华北都市农业重点实验室,北京 100097;4.河北农业大学食品科技学院,河北 保定 071001;5.石家庄市农林科学研究院,河北 石家庄 050041)
  • 出版日期:2025-01-25 发布日期:2024-12-30
  • 基金资助:
    北京市农林科学院科技创新能力建设专项(KJCX20240405;KJCX20240407); 财政部和农业农村部:国家现代农业产业技术体系资助项目(CARS-24-B-02;CARS-23-G-06)

Effects of Different Cultivation Modes on the Storage Quality and Flavor of Harvested Chinese Leek

ZHOU Xinyuan, TAO Jiejie, LIU Mingchi, ZUO Jinhua, WU Zhanhui, ZHENG Yanyan, KANG Xinna, LIANG Hao, MU Jianlou, CHEN Jie, JI Yanhai   

  1. (1. Vegetable Research Institute, Institute of Agricultural Products Processing and Food Nutrition, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China; 2. National Vegetable Engineering Technology Research Center, Beijing 100097, China; 3. Key Laboratory of North China Urban Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100097, China; 4. College of Food Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China; 5. Shijiazhuang Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050041, China)
  • Online:2025-01-25 Published:2024-12-30

摘要: 为探究不同栽培模式(水培、土培和基质培)对韭菜采后贮藏品质及风味物质的影响,采用水培、土培和基质培3 种栽培方式种植‘航研791’韭菜,采后放入20 ℃、相对湿度80%~85%的冷库中贮藏,测定其贮藏期间生理品质和风味物质的变化。结果表明:土培和基质培栽培方式能够较好地维持韭菜在贮藏期间的质量损失率和腐烂率,水培韭菜则质量损失率和腐烂率都较高,与水培相比,土培和基质培韭菜能够较好地维持VC和可溶性蛋白含量,具有较高的膳食纤维含量,土培还能促进纤维素、半纤维素、果胶和木质素含量的积累,基质培韭菜的木质素呈下降趋势,水培韭菜在贮藏过程中纤维素含量呈下降趋势,木质素含量则基本不变。韭菜的风味物质主要是醛类、醇类、酯类、醚类、杂环类化合物等,α-松油醇、丁酸异戊酯、水杨酸甲酯和苯乙醛等物质是3 种韭菜贮藏前后的主要风味物质。土培韭菜能够在贮藏过程中更好地维持韭菜的品质和风味物质,耐贮性最强,其在贮藏过程中品质劣变以衰老为主,基质培次之,水培韭菜则耐贮性最差,品质劣变以软化腐烂为主。

关键词: 不同栽培方式;韭菜;贮藏品质;挥发性风味物质

Abstract: In order to explore the effects of different cultivation modes (hydroponics, soil culture and substrate culture) on the postharvest quality and flavor substances of Chinese leek during storage, ‘Hangyan 791’ Chinese leek grown in hydroponics, soil culture or substrate culture were stored at 20 ℃ and relative humidity of 80%–85% after harvest and evaluated for changes in physiological quality and flavor substances. The results showed that soil culture and substrate culture better maintained the mass loss rate and decay rate of Chinese leek during storage, while hydroponics resulted in higher mass loss rate and decay rate. Compared with hydroponics, soil culture and substrate culture better maintained vitamin C (VC) and soluble protein contents, and resulted in higher dietary fiber content. Soil culture promoted the accumulation of cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin and lignin. Substrate culture resulted in a downward trend in lignin content. The cellulose content of the hydroponic leek showed a downward trend during storage, while the lignin content was basically unchanged. The main flavor substances of Chinese leek were aldehydes, alcohols, esters, ethers and heterocyclic compounds, among which α-terpineol, isoamyl butyrate, methyl salicylate and phenylacetaldehyde were common to the three samples, both before and after storage. The quality and flavor substances of the soil cultured leek were better maintained during storage, which had the strongest storability, and its quality deterioration was dominated by aging, followed by substrate culture. The hydroponic leek had the worst storability, with softening and rotting being the major signs of quality deterioration.

Key words: different cultivation methods; Chinese leek; storage quality; volatile flavor substances

中图分类号: