食品科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 35-42.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20251025-193

• 食品安全政策与法律专栏 • 上一篇    

食品安全风险治理中公众参与的制度困境与创新路径

屈志强   

  1. (中南大学马克思主义学院,湖南 长沙 410083)
  • 发布日期:2026-04-13
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省教育厅科学研究项目(24B0951);湖南省社会科学基金项目(23YBQ004); 长沙市哲学社会科学规划课题(2025CSSKKT08)

Institutional Dilemmas of and Innovative Paths for Public Participation in Food Safety Risk Governance

QU Zhiqiang   

  1. (School of Marxism, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)
  • Published:2026-04-13

摘要: 有效的食品安全风险治理离不开公众的广泛参与。食品安全风险治理中广泛的公众参与,一方面能够提高食品安全风险治理效能,另一方面也是人民民主权利在具体场景中的体现。目前,现行食品安全风险治理中的公众参与制度主要体现为立法过程参与、“控告检举、投诉举报”和公众参与权利规定上。现行食品安全风险治理中,公众参与面临信息获取维度的信息公开不充分、制度运行维度的参与广度深度受限以及制度保障维度的法律规范不完善等问题。为此,需要构建“输入端-运行端-保障端”全链条的公众参与制度创新体系:在输入端,构建“全链条、无死角”的食品安全风险信息公开制度、建立举证责任倾斜与证据获取机制、创新食品安全科普宣传;在运行端,要构建统一化、规范化的公众举报体系,确立公众利益诉求的实质性嵌入机制,强化媒体舆论监督的引导与保障;在保障端,要健全公众监督的激励配套制度、适当放宽公益诉讼的主体资格限制、完善惩罚性赔偿制度以强化震慑效果。

关键词: 食品安全风险;公众参与;投诉举报

Abstract: Effective governance of food safety risks cannot be achieved without extensive public participation. Extensive public participation in food safety risk governance can not only enhance its efficiency but also embody the democratic rights of the people in specific scenarios. The current system of public participation in food safety risk governance is mainly manifested in participation in the legislative process, “accusations, tip-offs, reports and complaints”, and the stipulation of public participation rights. In the current food safety risk governance, public participation faces problems such as insufficient information disclosure in the dimension of information acquisition, limited breadth and depth of participation in the dimension of system operation, and incomplete legal norms in the dimension of system guarantee. Therefore, it is necessary to build an innovative system for public participation covering the whole chain of “input-operation-guarantee”. At the input end, we should construct a “full-chain and all-around” food safety risk information disclosure system, establish a mechanism for tilted burden of proof and evidence acquisition, and innovate public education on food safety. At the operation end, we should build a unified and standardized public reporting system, establish a mechanism for the substantive embedding of public interest demands, and strengthen the guidance and guarantee for media and public opinion supervision. At the guarantee end, we should improve the supporting incentive system for public supervision, appropriately relax restrictions on the subject qualification of public interest litigation, and improve the punitive damages system to enhance its deterrent effect.

Key words: food safety risk; public participation; complaints and reports

中图分类号: