食品科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (14): 179-188.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20230824-183

• 食品工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同干燥方式对西兰花茎和叶品质的影响

李子煜, 吴婷, 马帅楠, 徐晓云   

  1. (1.华中农业大学食品科学技术学院, 湖北 武汉 430070;2.环境食品学教育部重点实验室, 湖北 武汉 430070;3.果蔬加工与品质调控湖北省重点实验室(华中农业大学), 湖北 武汉 430070)
  • 出版日期:2024-07-25 发布日期:2024-08-04
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省特色农产品深加工关键技术装备及产业化示范项目(2021-620-000-001-031)

Effects of Different Drying Methods on the Quality of Broccoli Stems and Leaves

LI Ziyu, WU Ting, MA Shuainan, XU Xiaoyun   

  1. (1. College of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;2. Key Laboratory of Environment Correlative Dietology (Ministry of Education), Wuhan 430070, China; 3. Hubei Key Laboratory of Fruit & Vegetable Processing & Quality Control (Huazhong Agricultural University), Wuhan 430070, China)
  • Online:2024-07-25 Published:2024-08-04

摘要: 为考察和评价西兰花副产物(茎和叶)的加工适应性并对其合理利用提供参考, 本研究对采用真空冷冻干燥(vacuum freeze drying, FD)、微波冷冻干燥(microwave freeze drying, MFD)、热泵干燥(heat pump drying, HPD)及热风干燥(hot air drying, HAD)制备的西兰花茎粉和叶粉的理化性质及营养品质进行研究。结果表明:MFD西兰花茎的色泽同鲜样差异ΔE为8.52±0.02, HAD的ΔE为30.27±0.28, 说明MFD保色效果较好;西兰花茎粉的中位粒径范围为31.19~52.09 μm, 叶粉的中位粒径范围为32.30~40.47 μm, 叶粉持水力和持油力均低于茎粉, 但其膨胀力较茎粉高, FD西兰花茎粉持水力为(11.40±0.46)g/g, MFD西兰花茎粉持油力为(1.40±0.04)g/g;FD和MFD能较好地保持西兰花茎和叶的微观结构, 有明显孔洞;FD和MFD处理等量西兰花茎的比能耗分别为7.35、3.26 kW·h/kg, 与FD相比, MFD节约了55.65%的能耗。MFD能较好地保存热敏性和易氧化的营养成分, 所以具有良好的抗氧化活性, 当MFD西兰花叶提取物质量浓度为0.125 mg/100 mL时, 其1, 1-二苯基-2-三硝基苯肼自由基清除率、2, 2’-联氮-双(3-乙基苯并噻唑啉-6-磺酸)阳离子自由基清除率及铁离子总还原能力分别为70.21%、71.11%、(0.31±0.01)mmol/g。综上可知, 西兰花茎粉和叶粉理化性质和营养品质良好, 可作为开发功能性食品的原料, 并且干燥技术的应用能够为西兰花茎和叶的合理利用提供可行参考。

关键词: 干燥方式;西兰花茎和叶;理化性质;营养品质;萝卜硫素

Abstract: In order to investigate and evaluate the processibility of broccoli by-products (stems and leaves) and hence to provide a reference for their rational utilization, this study investigated the physicochemical properties and nutritional quality of broccoli stem and leaf powders prepared by different drying methods, namely vacuum freeze drying (FD), microwave freeze drying (MFD), heat pump drying (HPD) and hot air drying (HAD). The results showed that the color difference ΔE between MFD-treated and fresh broccoli stems was 8.52 ± 0.02, which was smaller than that between HAD-treated and fresh samples (30.27 ± 0.28), indicating that MFD had better color preservation effect. The median particle size ranges of broccoli stem and leaf powders were 31.19–52.09 and 32.30–40.47 μm, respectively. Broccoli leaf powder had lower water and oil retention capacities but higher swelling force than that broccoli stem powder. The water retention capacity of FD-dried broccoli stem powder was (11.40 ± 0.46) g/g, and the oil retention capacity of MFD-dried broccoli stem powder was (1.40 ± 0.04) g/g. FD and MFD could effectively maintain the microstructure of broccoli stems and leaves, with obvious pores. The specific energy consumption of FD and MFD for treating an equal amount of broccoli stems was 7.35 and 3.26 kW·h/kg, respectively, so MFD reduced energy consumption by 55.65% when compared with FD. MFD maintained heat-sensitive and readily oxidized nutrients well, resulting in good antioxidant activity. The 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazine (DPPH) scavenging capacity, 2, 2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) cationic radical scavenging capacity and ferric ion reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) of MFD broccoli leaf extract at a concentration of 0.125 mg/100 mL were 70.21%, 71.11% and (0.31 ± 0.01) mmol/g, respectively. In summary, broccoli stem and leaf powders had good physicochemical properties and nutritional quality and therefore could be used as raw materials for developing functional foods. The application of drying technology enables the rational utilization of broccoli stems and leaves.

Key words: drying methods; broccoli stems and leaves; physicochemical properties; nutritional quality; sulforaphane

中图分类号: