食品科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (21): 201-210.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20250403-030

• 成分分析 • 上一篇    

日照白茶风味品质及关键呈香物质分析

毛兴萍,黄晓琴,张丽霞,付慧鑫,张雨柔,赵炳冯   

  1. (1.山东农业大学园艺科学与工程学院,山东?泰安 271018;2.日照市甲子山茶业有限公司,山东?日照 276860)
  • 发布日期:2025-11-10
  • 基金资助:
    山东现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(SDAIT-19-05);日照市岚山区农业农村局科技合作项目(233318)

Analysis of Flavor Quality and Key Aroma Compounds of Rizhao White Tea

MAO Xingping, HUANG Xiaoqin, ZHANG Lixia, FU Huixin, ZHANG Yurou, ZHAO Bingfeng   

  1. (1. College of Horticultural Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China; 2. Rizhao Jiazishan Tea Industry Co. Ltd., Rizhao 276860, China)
  • Published:2025-11-10

摘要: 为探究山东日照白茶品质现状,以3 个福建白茶茶样为对照,测定18 个日照白茶茶样的品质生化指标,并审评其感官品质,同时结合顶空固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用仪分析技术对其关键呈香物质进行分析。感官审评结果表明:日照白茶在外形上表现为色泽灰绿,芽心显,叶张完整,与福建白茶的香气纯正高爽带毫香、滋味醇厚相比,日照白茶香气清甜带花香、滋味清鲜甜醇,两者在汤色上均呈浅黄、杏黄或橙黄色,明亮清澈,叶底柔软;在主要生化成分方面,日照白茶大部分茶样的可溶性糖和总黄酮含量都高于福建白茶,游离氨基酸含量平均值略低于福建白茶,茶多酚含量略低于福鼎白茶,水浸出物和咖啡碱差异并不显著;香气测定结果显示,21 个白茶茶样共检测出172 种香气成分,以变量投影重要性>1且P<0.05为条件,一芽一、二叶制成的白茶共筛选出9 种差异挥发性物质,单叶(单叶带梗)制成的茶样共筛选出10 种差异挥发性物质,通过相对气味活性值(relative odor activity value,ROAV)对比分析,发现芳樟醇、香叶醇、苯甲醇、苯乙醇、叶醇、水杨酸甲酯、反式-β-紫罗兰酮、反式芳樟醇氧化物(呋喃类)、苯甲醛和2-戊基呋喃是日照白茶的关键性呈香化合物,且香叶醇、水杨酸甲酯、反式-β-紫罗兰酮和2-戊基呋喃等呈香化合物的ROAV与福建白茶相比较为突出,这也说明了日照白茶的关键香气化合物较为丰富。

关键词: 日照白茶;感官品质;生化成分;香气成分;顶空固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用仪

Abstract: To investigate the current quality status of Rizhao white tea in Shandong province, the biochemical quality indicators of 18 Rizhao white tea samples were determined and their sensory quality was evaluated. Meanwhile, their key aroma compounds were analyzed using headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). Three Fujian white tea samples were used as controls. The sensory evaluation results showed that Rizhao white tea was grayish-green in color and exhibited intact leaves with prominent bud cores. Fujian white tea had a pure and refreshing tip aroma and tasted mellow. Rizhao white tea had a delicate, sweet aroma with floral notes, and its taste was fresh, sweet and mellow. Both tea infusions had a light yellow, apricot-yellow or orange-yellow color and were bright and clear, and the infused tea leaves were soft to the touch. The soluble sugar and total flavonoid contents of most Rizhao white tea samples were higher than those of Fujian white tea, the average content of amino acid was slightly lower than that of Fujian white tea, the tea polyphenol content was slightly lower than that of Fuding white tea, while the differences in water extract and caffeine contents were not significant. A total of 172 aroma components were detected in the 21 white tea samples. Using the cutoff of variable importance in projection (VIP) score > 1 with a P value < 0.05, 9 differential volatile substances were selected between Rizhao and Fujian white tea made from one bud with one or two leaves, and 10 differential volatile substances were selected between Rizhao and Fujian tea samples made from single leaves (single leaves with stems). Based on relative odor activity values (ROAV), linalool, geraniol, benzyl alcohol, phenylethanol, leaf alcohol, methyl salicylate, trans-β-ionone, trans linalool oxide (furan), benzaldehyde, and 2-pentyl furan were identified as key aroma compounds in Rizhao white tea. Moreover, the ROAV of the aroma compounds geraniol, methyl salicylate, trans-β-ionone, and 2-pentyl furan were higher than those of Fujian white tea, indicating that Rizhao white tea was richer in key aroma compounds.

Key words: Rizhao white tea; sensory quality; biochemical components; aroma components; headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

中图分类号: