食品科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (13): 420-428.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20251015-085

• 专题论述 • 上一篇    

食品安全刑法保障的成就检视、问题透视与路径前瞻

陆丹   

  1. (中共淮南市委党校,安徽 淮南 232000)
  • 出版日期:2026-07-15 发布日期:2026-07-22

Food Safety in the Context of Risk Society Criminal Law Safeguards: Achievement Review, Problem Analysis, and Pathway Outlook

LU Dan   

  1. (Party School of CPC Huainan Municipal Committee, Huainan 232000, China)
  • Online:2026-07-15 Published:2026-07-22

摘要: 目前,食品安全已从传统的卫生管理问题演变为具有不确定性、系统性和全球性特征的风险。食品安全直接关系公众生命健康,构成对公共安全与社会稳定的严峻挑战。刑法作为社会防卫的最后手段,其保障体系的完善程度直接反映国家治理系统性风险的能力。本文立足于风险社会理论,系统考察我国食品安全刑法保障体系从无到有、从粗放到精细的演进脉络,揭示其从事后惩罚到风险预防的理念转换。通过比较法分析我国大陆法系与英美法系在风险分配、责任原则与刑罚配置上的路径差异,重点审视现行体系在刑事法网严密化、保护法益多元化、刑罚威慑强化及行刑衔接协同化等方面取得的成就,同时深入剖析其存在的立法价值定位偏差、刑罚结构功能失衡、规制范围存在盲区及行刑衔接机制不畅等问题。在此基础上,结合风险分配正义与积极一般预防理论,提出将食品安全犯罪归入危害公共安全罪、构建以资格刑与倍比罚金刑为核心的多元化刑罚体系及将过失危险犯与持有型犯罪纳入规制范围,并建立以数字赋能与公共利益为导向的行刑衔接机制,从而形成一套系统性、前瞻性的完善路径,以期为风险社会语境下构建更加科学、严密、高效的食品安全刑法治理体系提供可行的方案选择。

关键词: 风险社会;食品安全;刑法保障;成就检视;问题透视;路径前瞻

Abstract: At present, food safety has evolved from a traditional public health management issue into a modern risk characterized by high uncertainty, systemic nature, and global reach. It directly endangers the health and lives of the general public, posing a severe challenge to public safety and social stability. The criminal law protection system is the ultimate means of social defense, and its sophistication directly reflects the ability of a country to govern systemic risks and the level of law civilization. This paper, grounded in the risk society theory, systematically traces the evolution of China’s criminal law safeguards for food safety from inception to refinement revealing the underlying paradigm shift in criminal policy from post-incident retribution to risk prevention. Through a comparative legal lens, it examines the diverse approaches of major civil law and common law jurisdiction in risk allocation, liability principles, and sentencing configurations. This article critically examines the institutional achievements of the current system in tightening the criminal network, diversifying protected interests, strengthening deterrent penalties, and enhancing coordination between administrative and criminal enforcement. Moreover, it deeply analyzes the system’s structural challenges, including misaligned legislative values, imbalanced penal structure and function, regulatory blind spots, and inefficient administrative-criminal enforcement mechanisms. Building on this foundation and integrating theories of risk allocation justice and positive general prevention, this paper proposes classifying food safety crimes under crimes against public security, establishing a diversified penal system centered on qualifying penalties and multiple-fine penalties, expanding the scope of criminalization including negligent dangerous offenses and possession-based crimes, and optimizing the coordination mechanism between criminal and administrative enforcement through digital empowerment and public interest orientation. These systematic and forward-looking improvement pathways aim to provide robust intellectual support and feasible solutions for constructing a more scientific, rigorous, and efficient criminal law governance system for food safety within the context of a risk society.

Key words: risk society; food safety; criminal law safeguards; achievement review; problem analysis; pathway outlook

中图分类号: