食品科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8): 315-325.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20250909-070

• 食品工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

复合加工方式对调味扇贝肉品质的影响

杨昊铮,李秀霞,曹俊皓,刘慈坤,李冠霖,曹泽阳   

  1. (渤海大学食品科学与工程学院,辽宁 锦州 121013)
  • 出版日期:2026-04-25 发布日期:2026-05-15
  • 基金资助:
    “十四五”国家重点研发计划重点专项(2024YFD2401902)

Effects of Combined Processing Methods on the Quality of Seasoned Scallop Meat

YANG Haozheng, LI Xiuxia, CAO Junhao, LIU Cikun, LI Guanlin, CAO Zeyang   

  1. (College of Food Science and Engineering, Bohai University, Jinzhou 121013, China)
  • Online:2026-04-25 Published:2026-05-15

摘要: 本研究采用4 种方式对调味扇贝肉进行一次加工(水煮(W)、蒸制(G)、微波(M)、新鲜(F))及二次加工(水煮+油炸(WF)、蒸制+油炸(GF)、微波+油炸(MF)、新鲜+油炸(FF))相结合的复合加工,并分析复合加工对调味扇贝肉色泽、质构、营养成分、水分分布、蛋白质二级结构、热稳定性、微观结构和挥发性物质的影响。结果表明,MF组由于在一次加工后形成了较为疏松、多孔的结构,促进了油脂通过孔隙深入核心区域,在挂浆层引起的内部蒸汽压作用下,其硬度((736.32±14.73)N)高于GF和WF组,咀嚼度显著低于GF和WF组(P<0.05);MF组对不易流动水和自由水的束缚能力更强,通过微观结构观察发现MF组蛋白质聚集体重新构建为块状结构。GF组由于一次加工时的受热不均匀,表面肌原纤维蛋白聚集更剧烈、孔隙更大,从而导致二次加工后油脂渗透更严重,α-螺旋含量显著低于WF、MF组(P<0.05)。FF组由于加热时间最长,蛋白质的氧化和交联程度更为剧烈,α-螺旋相对含量((33.51±3.43)%)显著低于其他处理组,聚集焓(344.70 J/g)显著高于其他处理组(P<0.05)。在挥发性物质的保留方面,WF组表现最佳,能够最大程度地保留正己醛(青草香)、1-辛烯-3-醇(蘑菇泥土香)及4-异丙基苯甲醛等关键挥发性成分。因此,WF组由于保留挥发性物质最多,其他方面没有明显劣势,选择水煮与油炸结合的方式作为调味扇贝肉的复合加工方式。

关键词: 扇贝;复合加工;挥发性物质;低场核磁共振;蛋白质二级结构

Abstract: This study analyzed the effects of four combined processing methods, namely boiling (W), steaming (G), microwave (M), and fresh (F)) each followed by deep frying (denoted as WF, GF, MF, and FF, respectively) on the color, texture, nutritional components, water distribution, protein secondary structure, thermal stability, microstructure, and volatile substances of seasoned scallop meat. The results showed that boiled scallop had a loose and porous structure, which facilitated the penetration of oil into the core area through the pores. Under the internal steam pressure generated by the batter coating, the hardness ((736.32 ± 14.73) N) of the MF group was higher than that of the GF and WF groups, and its chewiness was significantly lower than that of the GF and WF groups (P < 0.05). The MF group showed a stronger binding capacity for immobilized water and free water, and microstructural observations revealed that protein aggregates were reconstructed into a blocky structure. The GF group exhibited more pronounced myofibrillar protein aggregation and larger pores on the surface due to uneven heating during steaming, which led to greater oil penetration during frying. Its α-helix content was significantly lower than that of the WF and MF groups (P < 0.05). The FF group had the longest heating time, resulting in more severe protein oxidation and cross-linking. Its relative content of α-helix, (33.51 ± 3.43)%, was significantly lower, while its enthalpy of aggregation (344.70 J/g) was significantly higher than that of the other treatment groups (P < 0.05). WF performed best in retaining volatile substances, retaining key volatile components such as hexanal (grass-like aroma), 1-octen-3-ol (mushroom-like and earthy aroma), and 4-isopropylbenzaldehyde to the greatest extent. Therefore, WF, which retained the highest number of volatile substances and showed no obvious disadvantages in other aspects, was selected as the preferred combined processing method for seasoned scallop meat.

Key words: scallops; combined processing; volatile substances; low-field nuclear magnetic resonance; protein secondary structure

中图分类号: