食品科学

• 专题论述 • 上一篇    下一篇

美国应对经济利益驱动型掺假和食品欺诈的经验及对我国的启示

李 丹1,王守伟1,臧明伍1,*,张凯华1,张哲奇1,周清杰2,张睿梅1   

  1. 1.北京食品科学研究院,中国肉类食品综合研究中心,北京 100068;2.北京工商大学经济学院,北京 100048
  • 出版日期:2016-04-15 发布日期:2016-04-13

The United States’ Experience in Dealing with Economically Motivated Adulteration and Food Fraud and Its Enlightenments to China

LI Dan1, WANG Shouwei1, ZANG Mingwu1,*, ZHANG Kaihua1, ZHANG Zheqi1, ZHOU Qingjie2, ZHANG Ruimei1   

  1. 1. China Meat Research Center, Beijing Academy of Food Sciences, Beijing 100068, China;
    2. School of Economics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
  • Online:2016-04-15 Published:2016-04-13

摘要:

食品欺诈自古就有,但是近年来随着食品供应链全球化和复杂化,以及商业竞争日趋激烈等原因,受经济利益驱动进行的食品掺假和欺诈活动愈演愈烈。美国是最早提出经济利益驱动型掺假概念的国家,并为应对经济利益驱动型掺假提出了一系列措施。本文首先将美国关于经济利益驱动型掺假和食品欺诈的定义进行了梳理,并将这两个概念与其他食品保护概念进行对比;其次,对比美国和中国经济利益驱动型掺假和食品欺诈的应对措施;最后,对我国应对经济利益型掺假和食品欺诈提出了四点建议。

关键词: 掺假, 经济利益驱动型掺假, 食品欺诈, 食品安全

Abstract:

Food fraud occurred since ancient times. In recent years, with the globalization and complication of the food
supply chain and increasingly competitive business, food adulteration and fraud driven by economic interests have been
intensified. This article summarizes the definitions of Economically Motivated Adulteration and Food Fraud in the United
States, compares the two concepts with other food protection concepts. The countermeasures taken by China and the United
States against economically motivated adulteration and food fraud are also compared. Moreover, four recommendations for
China to deal with these problems are proposed.

Key words: adulteration, economically motivated adulteration, food fraud, food safety

中图分类号: