年龄对舍饲育肥牦牛肉营养价值和抗氧化活性的影响

doi:10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20180831-374

食品科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (19): 77-82.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20180831-374

年龄对舍饲育肥牦牛肉营养价值和抗氧化活性的影响

董瑷榕，苗建军，彭忠利，曾钰，付洋洋，王鼎，郭春华

（西南民族大学生命科学与技术学院，动物科学国家民委重点实验室，四川成都 610041）

出版日期:2019-10-15 发布日期:2019-10-25
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目（2016NGJPY09）

Effect of Age on Nutritional Value and Antioxidant Activity of House-feeding Yak Meat

DONG Airong, MIAO Jianjun, PENG Zhongli, ZENG Yu, FU Yangyang, WANG Ding, GUO Chunhua

(Key Laboratory of Animal Science of State Ethnic Affairs Commission, College of Life Science and Technology, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, China)

Online:2019-10-15 Published:2019-10-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本实验旨在研究年龄对舍饲育肥牦牛肉营养价值和抗氧化活性的影响，为优质牦牛肉的生产提供指导。选取18 头健康麦洼公牦牛，根据年龄分为1.5、2.5 岁组和4.5 岁组，每组6 个重复，预饲期15 d，正式实验期180 d。结果表明：1）年龄对牦牛肉中粗蛋白质和粗灰分有显著影响（P＜0.05），其中4.5 岁组牦牛肉中粗蛋白质量分数为23.50%，2.5 岁组粗灰分质量分数为1.36%，均在3 组中最高；2）不同年龄牦牛肉中必需氨基酸占总氨基酸比例（the ratio of essential amino acids to total amino acids，EAA/TAA）和EAA占非必需氨基酸比例差异显著（P＜0.05），其中2.5 岁组最高，4.5 岁组其次，1.5 岁组最低，但2.5 岁组鲜味氨基酸占TAA比例仅为42.88%，显著低于1.5 岁组的43.49%和4.5 岁组的43.43%（P＜0.05）；3）年龄对脂肪酸质量分数影响较小，仅2.5 岁组二十一烷酸（C21:0）质量分数显著高于1.5 岁组和4.5 岁组（P＜0.05），而其他脂肪酸质量分数和比例差异不显著（P＞0.05），另外山嵛酸（C22:0）和11,14-二十碳烯酸（C20:2）仅在1.5 岁组中检出，在2.5 岁组和4.5 岁组均未检出；4）随着年龄的增长，牦牛肉中丙二醛含量不断升高，4.5 岁组比1.5 岁组升高了53.80%，但不同年龄牦牛肉中过氧化氢酶、总超氧化物歧化酶、谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶活力和总抗氧化能力无显著差异（P＞0.05）。综上所述，年龄能够影响牦牛肉的营养成分，但对其抗氧化活性无明显影响。

关键词: 年龄, 舍饲育肥, 牦牛, 营养价值, 抗氧化活性

Abstract: This study was conducted to investigate the effect of age on nutritional value and antioxidant activity of house-feeding yak meat, and to provide the guidance for the production of high-quality yak meat. The healthy Maiwa male yaks (n = 18) were allocated to three groups (1.5-year-old = ‘AGE1.5’, 2.5-year-old = ‘AGE2.5’ and 4.5-year-old = ‘AGE4.5’) by age, with 6 yaks in each group. Pre-experimental period was 15 days, and the trial period was 180 days. The results showed that: 1) the age had a significant effect on crude protein and crude ash of yak meat (P < 0.05). The content of crude protein in yak meat of AGE4.5 group was 23.50%, and the content of crude ash in yak meat of AGE2.5 group was 1.36%, which was the highest in three groups. 2) The ratio of essential amino acids to total amino acids (EAA/TAA) and essential amino acids to non-essential amino acids (EAA/NEAA) in different age groups were significantly different (P < 0.05), as followed by an order: AGE2.5 > AGE4.5 > AGE1.5. The ratio of flavor amino acids to total amino acids (FAA/TAA) in the AGE2.5 group was 42.88%, which was significantly lower than 43.49% in the AGE1.5 group and 43.43% in the AGE4.5 group (P < 0.05). 3) The effect of age on fatty acids in yak meat was relatively weak. The content of C21:0 in the AGE2.5 group was significantly higher than that of the AGE1.5 and AGE4.5 groups (P < 0.05), while the contents of other fatty acids were not significantly different (P > 0.05). The C22:0 and C20:2 were detected in the AGE1.5 group, but did not detected in the AGE2.5 and AGE4.5 groups. 4) As the extension of age, the content of malondialdehyde (MDA) gradually increased, with increase by 53.80% in the AGE4.5 group when compared with the AGE1.5 group. However, the contents of catalase (CAT), total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD), total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) in yak meat from different age groups were not significant (P > 0.05). In conclusion, age can modify nutritional components of yak meat, but has no significant effect on its antioxidant property.

Key words: age, house-feeding, yak, nutritional value, antioxidation property

中图分类号:

TS251.1

董瑷榕，苗建军，彭忠利，曾钰，付洋洋，王鼎，郭春华. 年龄对舍饲育肥牦牛肉营养价值和抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2019, 40(19): 77-82.

DONG Airong, MIAO Jianjun, PENG Zhongli, ZENG Yu, FU Yangyang, WANG Ding, GUO Chunhua. Effect of Age on Nutritional Value and Antioxidant Activity of House-feeding Yak Meat[J]. FOOD SCIENCE, 2019, 40(19): 77-82.

[1]	阴宏婕，鞠化鹏，钟利敏，孙娜，林松毅. 核黄素结合肽的生物活性及结构表征[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(9): 137-144.
[2]	白海军，李志江. 牛磺酸-水解大豆蛋白复合体系对运动性疲劳大鼠的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(9): 145-150.
[3]	郭刚军，胡小静，付镓榕，马尚玄，徐荣，黄克昌，彭志东，贺熙勇，邹建云. 澳洲坚果青皮不同极性溶剂分步提取物功能成分与抗氧化活性及其相关性分析[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(7): 74-82.
[4]	李伟，叶嘉宜，陈运娇，曹庸. 桉叶多酚提取物体内外抗氧化活性评价[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(5): 160-168.
[5]	麦绮莹，范亚苇，邓泽元，张兵. 胎牛血清与矢车菊素-3-葡萄糖苷非共价相互作用机制及对其抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(5): 1-8.
[6]	魏晨业，包晓玮，王娟，何梦梦，曾兰君，张亚涛. 沙棘多糖分离纯化及抗氧化活性[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(4): 227-232.
[7]	姜慧，孔立敏，王翀，王彦波，傅玲琳，周涛. 条斑紫菜多糖的降解条件优化及其生物活性[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(3): 38-47.
[8]	毛小雨，许馨予，杨鹄隽，贾斌，左锋. 紫花芸豆蛋白体外消化产物的抗氧化活性及结构特征分析[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(3): 56-62.
[9]	杨二林，赵浩安，徐元元，王悦，王银，曹炜. 枣花蜜酚类化合物组成及其抗氧化活性分析[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(3): 150-157.
[10]	周浓，余志良，李承勇. 玉米醇溶蛋白-番石榴黄酮复合纳米颗粒的制备及其抗氧化活性[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(3): 186-193.
[11]	张萌，曹婷婷，程紫薇，金文渊，金鹏，郑永华. 高湿贮藏对青椒果实冷害和抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(3): 243-250.
[12]	于素素，杨佳杰，马向阳，贾新栋，刘丽波，杜鹏，李艾黎. 含发酵乳杆菌HY01牦牛酸奶工艺优化及主体风味成分动态解析[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(2): 105-113.
[13]	赵磊，潘飞，林文轩，徐美利，鲍玺，陈艳麟，王成涛，连运河. 甜叶菊废渣提取物的主要成分分析及其抗氧化作用[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(2): 247-254.
[14]	蒋鹏飞，高海东，赵丽丽，王赵改，史冠莹，张乐，王晓敏，王旭增. 不同采收期香椿茶发酵前后活性成分、降糖活性及其挥发性成分比较分析[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(2): 262-270.
[15]	宋晓秋，徐亚杰，肖瀛，王一非，陈佳昊. 肉桂精油微胶囊对小鼠抗氧化活性与肠道菌群的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(17): 143-152.

年龄对舍饲育肥牦牛肉营养价值和抗氧化活性的影响

Effect of Age on Nutritional Value and Antioxidant Activity of House-feeding Yak Meat

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价