不同季节保靖黄金茶1号工夫红茶挥发性成分的HS-SPME-GC-MS分析

doi:10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20190721-265

食品科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 188-196.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20190721-265

不同季节保靖黄金茶1号工夫红茶挥发性成分的HS-SPME-GC-MS分析

黄浩，余鹏辉，赵熙，钟妮，郑红发

（1.湖南省农业科学院茶叶研究所，湖南长沙 410125；2.湖南农业大学教育部茶学重点实验室，湖南长沙 410128；3.国家植物功能成分利用工程技术研究中心，湖南长沙 410128）

出版日期:2020-06-25 发布日期:2020-06-22
基金资助:
“十三五”国家重点研发计划重点专项（2017YFD0400802）；湖南省重点研发计划项目（2018NK2035）；现代农业（茶叶）产业技术体系建设专项（CARS-19）；湖南省农业科技创新资金项目（2018QN31）

HS-SPME-GC-MS Analysis of Volatile Components of Congou Black Tea Processed from Baojing Huangjincha 1 from Different Harvesting Seasons

HUANG Hao, YU Penghui, ZHAO Xi, ZHONG Ni, ZHENG Hongfa

(1. Tea Research Institute, Hunan Academy Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Tea Science, Ministry of Education, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China; 3. National Research Center of Engineering Technology for Utilization Ingredients from Botanicals, Changsha 410128, China)

Online:2020-06-25 Published:2020-06-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究不同季节湖南保靖黄金茶1号工夫红茶的香气品质特点，以春、夏和秋季保靖黄金茶1号一芽一叶为原料分别加工成工夫红茶样品，采用顶空固相微萃取结合气相色谱-质谱联用对3 个季节工夫红茶的挥发性成分进行分析，结合感官审评考察不同季节对保靖黄金茶1号工夫红茶挥发性成分的影响。结果表明，3 个季节工夫红茶香气均以甜香为主要特征，具体表现为春茶甜香纯正，夏茶甜香尚高，秋茶甜香带花香，秋茶香气指数最高，香气品质最好，夏、春茶次之，与感官审评结果一致。3 个季节工夫红茶样品检出并鉴定到80 种香气成分，其中春、夏和秋季红茶样品中分别检测出51、63 种和66 种香气成分，共有组分40 种，主要以醇类、醛类、碳氢化合物、酯类和酮类物质为主；基于不同季节工夫红茶香气成分的含量作主成分分析（拟合参数为R2X=0.941，Q2=0.825）并建立偏最小二乘-判别分析模型（拟合参数为R2X=0.972，R2Y=0.994，Q2=0.982）可有效区分春、夏和秋季的工夫红茶样品，不同季节工夫红茶的标志差异性化合物有13 种，分别为水杨酸甲酯、苯甲醛、月桂烯、2,6-二甲基-3,7-辛二烯-2,6-二醇、1-乙基-2-甲酰吡咯、藏红花醛、反-橙叔醇、苯乙烯、2-辛烯-1-醛、反-2-癸烯醛、苯乙醇、反-芳樟醇氧化物（吡喃型）、反-2-壬烯醛。

关键词: 工夫红茶, 保靖黄金茶1号, 挥发性成分, 季节, 顶空固相微萃取, 气相色谱-质谱联用

Abstract: In order to evaluate the aroma characteristics of Congou black tea from different harvesting seasons, Congou black tea were processed from one bud with one leaf from the cultivar Baojing Huangjincha 1 harvested in spring, summer and autumn and were analyzed for their volatile components by using headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). Meanwhile, sensory evaluation was conducted to investigate the effects of different harvesting seasons on the volatile aroma characteristics of Congou black tea. The results showed that the aroma of Congou black tea was mainly characterized as sweet and fragrant for all three seasons, specifically pure sweet aroma for spring tea, strong sweet aroma for summer tea, and sweet and flowery aroma for autumn tea. In addition, the flavor index (FI) of autumn tea was the highest and its aroma quality was the best, followed by summer and spring teas. This was consistent with the results of sensory evaluation. A total of 80 aroma components were detected and identified in the three samples, and 51, 63 and 66 in spring, summer and autumn teas respectively. In total, 40 aroma components were common to these samples mainly including alcohols, aldehydes, hydrocarbons, esters and ketones. The contents of aroma components in Congou black tea were analyzed by principal component analysis (R2X = 0.941, Q2 = 0.825), and we further established a partial least squares-discriminant analysis model (R2X = 0.972, R2Y = 0.994, and Q2 = 0.982) to effectively distinguish the three tea samples. There were 13 landmark compounds that differed among these samples, including methyl salicylate, benzaldehyde, myrcene, 3,7-octad iene-2,6-diol,2,6-dimethyl, 1-ethyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carbaldehyde, safranal, (E)-nerolidol, styrene, 2-octen-1-al, trans-2-decenal, phenylethyl alcohol, 2-[(2S,5S)-5-ethenyl-5-methyltetrahydrofuran-2-yl]propan-2-ol-2H-pyran, and (E)-2-nonenal.

Key words: Congou black tea, Baojing Huangjincha 1, volatile components, seasons, headspace solid-phase microextraction, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

中图分类号:

TS272

黄浩，余鹏辉，赵熙，钟妮，郑红发. 不同季节保靖黄金茶1号工夫红茶挥发性成分的HS-SPME-GC-MS分析[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(12): 188-196.

HUANG Hao, YU Penghui, ZHAO Xi, ZHONG Ni, ZHENG Hongfa. HS-SPME-GC-MS Analysis of Volatile Components of Congou Black Tea Processed from Baojing Huangjincha 1 from Different Harvesting Seasons[J]. FOOD SCIENCE, 2020, 41(12): 188-196.

[1]	刘玉兰，舒垚，孙国昊，马宇翔，姜元荣，陈宁. 花生品种对花生酱风味及综合品质的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(9): 15-21.
[2]	单启梅，赵晓策，罗瑞明，尤丽琴. 滩羊肌肉在煮制过程中可挥发性化合物的变化[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(8): 165-171.
[3]	董烨，张益奇，姚洪正，何光喜，戴志远. 预处理方式对鳙鱼骨蛋白酶解液游离氨基酸和挥发性成分的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(8): 179-185.
[4]	余鹏辉，黄浩，赵熙，钟妮，龚雨顺，郑红发. 黄金茶工夫红茶的甜味量化及其与主要滋味物质相关性分析[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(8): 192-197.
[5]	刘盼盼，郑鹏程，龚自明，常泽睿，苏方俊，黄波，冯琳，高士伟，郑琳. 橘红茶香气特征及风味成分分析[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(8): 198-205.
[6]	张舒，王长远，冯玉超，盛亚男，富天昕，张艺玮，姜颖俊，于淼，张丽媛. 气相色谱-质谱联用代谢组学技术分析不同产地稻米代谢物[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(8): 206-213.
[7]	陈丽花，任丽霞，李东娜，马霞. 甜酒曲中优质酵母菌的分离鉴定及其产香特性分析[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(6): 142-149.
[8]	张琴，周丹丹，彭菁，潘磊庆，屠康. 油桃采后结合态香气变化规律及其与可溶性糖的关联性[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(6): 206-214.
[9]	程超，夏兰欣，杜芬妮，李伟，田成. 基于9 种风味物质的利川红SPME优化及PLS-DA风味识别[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(6): 215-222.
[10]	马腾臻，宫鹏飞，史肖，牛见明，王春霞，翟文娟，张波，韩舜愈. 红枣发酵酒香气成分分析及感官品质评价[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(4): 247-253.
[11]	彭常梅，方锐琳，赖敏，邓泽元，刘小如，李静. 不同提取方法对牡丹籽油品质的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(3): 104-111.
[12]	王鹤潼，潘泓杉，王朝，方东路，胡秋辉，马宁. 不同品种金针菇特征挥发性物质的差异分析[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(2): 193-199.
[13]	丁丹，王松磊，罗瑞明，王永瑞，柏霜，沈菲，柏鹤. 基于SPME-GC-MS分析不同烤制时间新疆烤羊腿表层及内层挥发性化合物[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(2): 227-234.
[14]	蒋鹏飞，高海东，赵丽丽，王赵改，史冠莹，张乐，王晓敏，王旭增. 不同采收期香椿茶发酵前后活性成分、降糖活性及其挥发性成分比较分析[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(2): 262-270.
[15]	王贺，赵玉红，杨凯. HS-SPME-GC-MS结合电子鼻对10 个品系红松籽油挥发性物质分析比较[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(18): 178-184.

不同季节保靖黄金茶1号工夫红茶挥发性成分的HS-SPME-GC-MS分析

HS-SPME-GC-MS Analysis of Volatile Components of Congou Black Tea Processed from Baojing Huangjincha 1 from Different Harvesting Seasons

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价