食品科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8): 43-51.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20250919-145

• 基础研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同品种春夏季红碎茶适制性比较

王悦萍,覃信雪,陈亚忠,倪德江,陈玉琼   

  1. (1.华中农业大学园艺林学学院,果蔬园艺作物种质创新与利用全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430070;2.云南高黎贡绿色产业创新研究院,云南 保山 678000)
  • 出版日期:2026-04-25 发布日期:2026-05-15
  • 基金资助:
    “十四五”国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFD1600804); 云南省科技厅创新引导与科技型企业培育计划项目(202304BQ040118)

Comparative Study on the Broken Black Tea Processing Suitability of Different Tea Varieties in Spring and Summer

WANG Yueping, QIN Xinxue, CHEN Yazhong, NI Dejiang, CHEN Yuqiong   

  1. (1. National Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation & Utilization of Horticultural Crops, College of Horticulture & Forestry Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; 2. Yunnan Gaoligong Green Industry Innovation Research Institute, Baoshan 678000, China)
  • Online:2026-04-25 Published:2026-05-15

摘要: 本研究以同一种植园的39 个茶树品种为对象,采摘其春季和夏季鲜叶并按同一工艺加工成红碎茶,分析感官品质和主要理化指标及其相关性,基于多元统计分析不同品种春夏季原料加工成红碎茶的品质差异。结果表明,不同品种和季节对红碎茶品质有显著影响。春季红碎茶感官评分(82.2~92.7 分,平均88 分)普遍高于夏季(81.1~91.2 分,平均87 分),干茶色泽、香气、滋味评分和总分的变异系数都以春茶高于夏茶,说明春季红碎茶品种间品质差异大于夏季。茶多酚、茶黄素、茶红素和氨基酸平均含量春季高于夏季;茶褐素和可溶性糖平均含量春季低于夏季。相关性分析表明,茶多酚含量与春、夏季红碎茶感官品质呈显著正相关,可溶性糖含量与春季红碎茶感官品质及氨基酸含量与夏季红碎茶感官品质则呈负相关。通过主成分分析和多元回归分析构建的综合评价体系将不同品种红碎茶适制性分为3 类:春夏皆宜型(如恩茶红、鸠坑早等)、季节依赖型(如梅占、黄旦等)和欠适制型(如龙井43、白叶1号和福云6号)。本研究结果可为生产实践中的红茶品种选择与季节搭配提供理论依据和实践指导。

关键词: 茶树品种;红碎茶;适制性;季节;综合评价

Abstract: In this study, 39 tea tree varieties from the same plantation were employed, and their fresh spring and summer leaves were harvested and processed into broken black tea (BBT) using a standardized manufacturing process. The sensory quality and major physicochemical indicators were examined, and their correlations were analyzed. The quality differences between BBT produced from spring and summer raw materials from different varieties were clarified using multivariate statistical analysis. The results indicated that different varieties and seasons significantly impacted the quality of BBT. The sensory evaluation scores of BBT in spring (82.2–92.7 points, averaging 88 points) were generally higher than those in summer (81.1–91.2 points, averaging 87 points). The coefficients of variation for color, aroma, taste, and overall scores were higher in spring tea than in summer tea, indicating that the inter-varietal variation in BBT quality was greater in spring than in summer. Spring BBT exhibited higher average contents of tea polyphenols, theaflavins, thearubigins, and amino acids compared with summer BBT, while the opposite was observed for theabrownins and soluble sugars. Correlation analysis revealed that a significant positive correlation between tea polyphenol content and sensory quality was observed for both spring and summer tea. In contrast, the sensory quality of spring and summer BBT exhibited a negative correlation with the contents of soluble sugars and amino acids, respectively. A comprehensive evaluation system was developed using principal component analysis (PCA) and multiple regression analysis (MRA) to classify the tea varieties into three categories based on their BBT processing suitability: suitable for both spring and summer (e.g., Enchahong and Jiukengzao), season-dependent (e.g., Meizhan and Huangdan), and poorly suitable (e.g., Longjing 43, Baiye 1, and Fuyun 6). These findings provide a theoretical basis and practical guidance for variety selection and seasonal matching in BBT production.

Key words: tea tree varieties; broken black tea; suitability for processing; season; comprehensive evaluation

中图分类号: