食品科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (7): 221-231.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20251011-049

• 成分分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

金花白茶与茯砖茶感官品质与化学成分比较分析

韦明竹,蔺志远,钟婉婧,彭佳堃,高彩霞,苗玄,肖愈,戴伟东   

  1. (1.湖南农业大学食品科学技术学院,湖南 长沙 410128;2.中国农业科学院茶叶研究所,浙江 杭州 310008)
  • 出版日期:2026-04-15 发布日期:2026-05-08
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省自然科学基金杰出青年项目(LR23C160002);宁德市产学研合作项目(2025C006); 国家自然科学基金面上项目(32172630);国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(32302611)

Comparative Analysis of Sensory Quality and Chemical Composition between Jinhua White Tea and Fu Brick Tea​

WEI Mingzhu, LIN Zhiyuan, ZHONG Wanjing, PENG Jiakun, GAO Caixia, MIAO Xuan, XIAO Yu, DAI Weidong   

  1. (1. School of Food Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China; 2. Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310008, China)
  • Online:2026-04-15 Published:2026-05-08

摘要: 选取4 个金花白茶样品和5 个茯砖茶样品,系统探索金花白茶和茯砖茶的感官品质与化学成分差异。感官审评结果表明,相较于茯砖茶,金花白茶茶汤颜色偏红,香气带甜果香,滋味整体甘和或醇和。基于液相色谱-质谱联用的代谢组学分析在茶样中共鉴定出130 种化合物,包括生物碱类8 种、氨基酸类9 种、二聚体儿茶素13 种、N-乙基-2-吡咯烷酮取代的黄烷-3-醇(N-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinone-substituted flavan-3-ol,EPSF)类16 种、黄烷醇类15 种、黄酮醇糖苷和黄酮糖苷类31 种、黄酮类2 种、脂质类2 种、有机酸类8 种、酚酸类11 种、儿茶素B环裂变衍生物7 种和其他物质8 种。偏最小二乘判别分析和热图分析结果表明,茯砖茶和金花白茶之间的化学成分具有较大差异,其中78 种化合物差异显著(P<0.05)。金花白茶中氨基酸含量总体高于茯砖茶;酯型儿茶素(表没食子儿茶素没食子酸酯、表儿茶素没食子酸酯、没食子儿茶素没食子酸酯和儿茶素没食子酸酯)含量低于茯砖茶,而非酯型儿茶素(表没食子儿茶素和表儿茶素)则高于茯砖茶;儿茶素二聚体类(茶黄素类、聚酯型儿茶素类、原花青素类)在金花白茶组中含量普遍高于茯砖茶组;4 种具有差异性的儿茶素B环裂变衍生物在金花白茶组中的含量显著高于茯砖茶组;12 种EPSF类化合物在金花白茶组中的含量显著低于茯砖茶组;黄酮醇糖苷和黄酮糖苷类物质在茯砖茶组中含量较低;咖啡因和鸟苷酸在金花白茶组中含量高于茯砖茶组。本研究通过感官审评和代谢组学方法系统阐明了金花白茶与茯砖茶在风味品质和非挥发性成分方面的差异,为金花白茶健康功效的阐明提供了理论依据。

关键词: 金花白茶;茯砖茶;代谢组学;液相色谱-质谱联用;感官审评?

Abstract: This study included four Jinhua white tea samples and five Fu brick tea samples to systematically investigate the differences in sensory quality and chemical composition between the two types of tea. Sensory evaluation results showed that compared with Fu brick tea infusion, Jinhua white tea infusion exhibited a redder color with a sweet, fruity aroma and a sweet, mild/mellow taste profile. A total of 130 compounds were identified in the tea samples using a metabolomics approach based on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), including 8 alkaloids, 9 amino acids, 13 dimeric catechins, 16 N-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinone-substituted flavan-3-ol (EPSF), 15 flavanols, 31 flavanols and flavanol-O-glycosides, 2 flavonoids, 2 lipids, 8 organic acids, 11 phenolic acids, 7 catechin B-ring cleavage derivatives, and 8 other compounds. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and heatmap analysis revealed significant differences in chemical composition between Jinhua white tea and Fu brick tea. Among these, 78 significantly differential compounds were identified (P < 0.05). Amino acid content was generally higher in Jinhua white tea than in Fu brick tea. Jinhua white tea had lower levels of esterified catechins (epigallocatechin gallate, epicatechin gallate, gallocatechin gallate, and catechin gallate) but higher levels of non-esterified catechins (epicatechin and epigallocatechin) than Fu brick tea. The contents of catechin dimers (theaflavins, theasinesins, and procyanidins), as well as those of 4 differential catechin derivatives with B-ring cleavage, were generally higher in Jinhua white tea than in Fu brick tea. The contents of 12 EPSFs were significantly lower in Jinhua white tea than in Fu brick tea. The levels of flavanols and flavanol-O-glycosides were lower in Fu brick tea than in Jinhua white tea. The contents of caffeine and guanylate (GMP) were both significantly higher in Jinhua white tea than in Fu brick tea. This study provides a theoretical basis for clarifying the health benefits of Jinhua white tea.

Key words: Jinhua white tea; Fu brick tea; metabonomics; liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; sensory evaluation

中图分类号: