Comparative Study on Bacteriostasis of Different Preservatives for Three Typical Spoilage Bacteria

doi:10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201101004

FOOD SCIENCE ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1 ): 14-18.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201101004

• Basic Research • Previous Articles Next Articles

Comparative Study on Bacteriostasis of Different Preservatives for Three Typical Spoilage Bacteria

CHEN Nan-nan1，XU Xin1，SHANG Feng-cai1，HUANG Qin1，CHEN You-liang2，LI Wei-fen1,*

1. Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Institute of Feed Science, College of Animal Science,
Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China；2. Laboratory of Animal Product Processing, College of Animal Science,
Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China

Received:2010-03-22 Revised:2010-12-07 Online:2011-01-15 Published:2010-12-28
Contact: LI Wei-fen E-mail:wfli@zju.edu.cn

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective: The inhibitory effects of twenty-three food preservatives on three typical spoilage bacteria were evaluated and compared. Methods: The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of different preservatives for Micrococcus luteus, Bacillus subtilis and E.coli were determined by micro-dilution assay. Results: Among the 23 tested food preservatives, Nisin and ε-poly-L-lysine had the best inhibitory effect on Micrococcus luteus (G+ cocci), and their MICs were both 12.5 μg/mL. For Bacillus subtilis (G+ bacillus), the best antimicrobials were calcium propionate, diacetyl, citric acid, citral and D-sodium isoascorbiate, presenting an identical MIC of 6.25μg/mL. As for E.coli (G－ bacillus), hydrogen peroxide and diacetyl were the best preservatives, with an identical MIC of 25μg/mL. Conclusion: The bacteriostasis of various tested preservatives for the three typical spoilage bacteria is irregular and their combined use seems to be an approach for more effective bacteriostasis.

Key words: preservative, spoilage bacteria, minimal inhibition concentration, bacteriostasis

CLC Number:

TS202.3

CHEN Nan-nan1，XU Xin1，SHANG Feng-cai1，HUANG Qin1，CHEN You-liang2，LI Wei-fen1,*. Comparative Study on Bacteriostasis of Different Preservatives for Three Typical Spoilage Bacteria[J]. FOOD SCIENCE, 2011, 32(1 ): 14-18.

[1]	LI Jiayi, CHEN Sai, LIU Yongle, YU Jian, LI Xianghong, HUANG Yiqun, WANG Faxiang. Effect of Chitosan Coating Incorporated with Food Preservatives on the Muscle Quality of Grass Carp during Cold Storage [J]. FOOD SCIENCE, 2021, 42(7): 220-225.
[2]	WANG Ming, ZHANG Jiatao, ZHOU Bin, DING Jie, XU Zhaomeng, SUN Tong. Antibacterial Mechanism of Eugenol-Containing Composite Preservatives against Shewanella putrefaciens [J]. FOOD SCIENCE, 2021, 42(13): 10-16.
[3]	SUN Ruolan, XIAO Liang, YI Youjin, DENG Houqin, XIN Xiaofei, ZHU Lihong, SANG Yiyuan, FANG Zhengchu. Progress in Techniques for Postharvest Quality Preservation of Agaricus bisporus [J]. FOOD SCIENCE, 2021, 42(1): 333-340.
[4]	CAO Xueqin, YANG Fei, CHEN Guotong, MAO Qiongling, LI Fang, YANG Zhong. Determination of 10 Preservative Residues in Fruits by Ultra-high Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry [J]. FOOD SCIENCE, 2020, 41(4): 319-324.
[5]	YUAN Fang, QIU Shiming, LI Li,. Effect of Composite Preservatives on Active Oxygen Metabolism, Cell Membrane Permeability and Browning of Fresh-Cut Mango [J]. FOOD SCIENCE, 2020, 41(3): 218-223.
[6]	WU Jiao, YANG Hua, ZHANG Jiatao, ZHANG Ran, SUN Tong, XIE Jing, GUO Xiaohua, YU Jianyang, LI Jianrong. Preservation Effect of in-Situ Synthetic Nano-SiOx/Lysozyme/Teapolyphenols/Chitosan Composite Coatings on Sea Bass Fillets [J]. FOOD SCIENCE, 2020, 41(23): 181-189.
[7]	QIU Tingting, TAN Xiao, LI Ruonan, ZHOU Lisha, ZHAO Yanyun, CHEN Shunsheng, ZHANG Hongcai. Recent Advances in Preparation and Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activity of Chitosan-Monosaccharides Maillard Reaction Products [J]. FOOD SCIENCE, 2020, 41(19): 327-333.
[8]	ZHAO Mengqian, ZHANG Yadan, WANG Yingxiang, LIU Na, ZHANG Nan, JIAN Jiayu, ZHANG Lin, ZHANG Jihong. Controlled Release and Maintained Antibacterial and Antioxidant Effects of Thyme Essential Oil Encapsulated in Self-Assembled Peptide Hydrogel [J]. FOOD SCIENCE, 2020, 41(15): 8-14.
[9]	ZHONG Yuanyuan, LI Wenhui, LU Shiling, WANG Qingling, RAN Lidan, DONG Juan. Antibacterial Activity and Preservative Effect of Inclusion Complex of Grape Seed Extract (GSE) with (2-Hydroxypropyl)-β-Cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD) against Spoilage Bacteria in Lamb Tripe [J]. FOOD SCIENCE, 2020, 41(15): 224-230.
[10]	TONG Jixu, ZHU Zhiqiang, QIAN Yongzhong. SO2 Residue and Potential Dietary Health Risk Assessment in Grapes under Different Storage Conditions [J]. FOOD SCIENCE, 2020, 41(1): 163-167.
[11]	LI Ping, YAN Jingkun, CONG Fangdi, ZHANG Xin, CUI Jing. Effects of Cinnamon Oil and Its Inclusion Complex with β-Cyclodextrin on Preserving the Quality of Fresh-Cut Watermelon [J]. FOOD SCIENCE, 2019, 40(9): 276-282.
[12]	ZOU Xiaobo, YANG Zhikun, SHI Jiyong, HUANG Xiaowei, ZHANG Wen, Haroon Elrasheid TAHIR. Preservation Effect of Gum Arabic Edible Coating Incorporated with White Roselle Extract (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) on Cold-Stored Blueberries [J]. FOOD SCIENCE, 2019, 40(7): 204-211.
[13]	HUANG Liyuan, MAO Shun, LI Ruiting, WANG Yongqin, YU Honghong, LU Shiling. Effect and Mechanism of Garlic Essential Oil on Putrescine Accumulation by Lactobacillus delbrueckii Isolated from Smoked Horse Meat Sausages [J]. FOOD SCIENCE, 2019, 40(5): 17-23.
[14]	MA Ruijia, CAI Chenchen, LEI Caiyu, WANG Youfa, LU Dengjun. Preparation of Bagasse-Nano Silver Oxide Preservative [J]. FOOD SCIENCE, 2019, 40(24): 274-280.
[15]	YANG Yajing, HAN Yuzhu, MENG Xing, WANG Yuying, LI Kai, XU Siqi, YANG Yemei. Effect of Composite Antimicrobial Coating Containing Cinnamaldehyde on Postharvest Preservation of Litchi Fruit [J]. FOOD SCIENCE, 2019, 40(23): 253-261.

Comparative Study on Bacteriostasis of Different Preservatives for Three Typical Spoilage Bacteria

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments