食品科学

• 专题论述 • 上一篇    下一篇

关于食品欺诈的国内外比较研究进展

唐晓纯,李笑曼,张冰妍   

  1. 中国人民大学农业与农村发展学院,北京 100872
  • 出版日期:2015-08-15 发布日期:2015-08-17

Comparative Research of Food Fraud at Home and Abroad

TANG Xiaochun, LI Xiaoman, ZHANG Bingyan   

  1. School of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
  • Online:2015-08-15 Published:2015-08-17

摘要:

2013年初发生的“马肉风波”震惊欧洲各国的同时,也使食品的“真实性”和“安全性”问题再次引起了公众的广泛关注。中国目前正处于食品安全与食品欺诈事件时有发生的混乱局面,食品欺诈事件又大多是“安全性”问题,尤其是非法添加非食用物质问题,加大了食品安全的治理难度。本文通过梳理近年来国内发生的食品安全以及食品欺诈事件,在比较国内外食品欺诈事件性质差异的基础上,通过对发达国家应对食品欺诈事件的策略分析,以及重典法治的历史经验,提出了5 点思考与建议。期望加强食品安全社会共治的第三方力量,继续保持严打违法添加的高压态势,加大对食品欺诈行为的惩罚力度,使我国食品欺诈的“安全性”问题尽快得到改善,从而降低食品安全问题的严重程度,提高消费者对食品安全的信心。

关键词: 食品安全, 食品欺诈, 食品真实性, 社会共治, 惩罚性赔偿制度

Abstract:

As the horsemeat scandal occurring in 2013 shocked European countries, considerable worldwide attention has
been paid to the authenticity and safety of foods. The fraud cases especially adding inedible materials into foods illegally not
only affect the situation of food safety, but also increase the difficulties in food safety management. This paper analyzes the
domestic food safety and food fraud events in recent years and compares the different properties of food fraud cases at home
and abroad. Based on analysis of the solutions of developed countries and the historical experiences emphasizing laws, this
paper puts forward five suggestions. We hope to strengthen the third party power in food safety management, maintain the
high pressure on the illegal behavior and increase the penalties for food fraud behaviors in order to improve the food safety
situation and rebuild consumers’ confidence in food safety.

Key words: food safety, food fraud, food authenticity, society multi-governance, punitive damages system

中图分类号: