食品科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 257-263.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20200414-187

• 安全检测 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于高光谱和超声成像技术的原切与合成调理牛排鉴别

孙宗保,王天真,邹小波,刘源,梁黎明,李君奎,刘小裕   

  1. (1.江苏大学食品与生物工程学院,江苏 镇江 212013;2.镇江市食品药品监督检验中心,江苏 镇江 212000)
  • 出版日期:2021-04-25 发布日期:2021-05-14
  • 基金资助:
    “十三五”国家重点研发计划重点专项(2016YFD0401104);江苏高校优势学科建设工程项目; 镇江市重点研发项目(SH2019019)

Discrimination between Raw and Restructured Beef Steak Using Hyperspectral and Ultrasound Imaging

SUN Zongbao, Wang Tianzhen, Zou Xiaobo, LIU Yuan, Liang Liming, LI Junkui, Liu Xiaoyu   

  1. (1. School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China;2. Zhenjiang Institute for Food and Drug Control, Zhenjiang 212000, China)
  • Online:2021-04-25 Published:2021-05-14

摘要: 针对市场上存在合成调理牛排冒充原切售卖的现象,研究利用高光谱和超声成像技术对它们进行鉴别的方法。分别采集原切与合成调理牛排的高光谱和超声图像信息,利用灰度共生矩阵法提取图像的纹理特征值,分别建立线性判别分析、K最邻近(K-nearest neighbor,KNN)、反向传播人工神经网络和极限学习机(extreme learning machine,ELM)4?种鉴别模型,而后将2?种技术数据融合建模,并采用连续投影法、竞争性自适应重加权算法(competitive adaptive reweighted sampling,CARS)、变量组合集群分析(variables combination population analysis,VCPA)法3?种方法筛选特征变量建模。结果表明:合成调理牛排的肉块组织均匀,超声图像信号弱、均一性好,与原切调理牛排图像存在差异。高光谱和超声成像技术的最佳模型分别为KNN和ELM,模型预测集识别率分别为95.00%和90.00%。数据融合后建模,最佳模型ELM模型预测集识别率模型为97.50%,在3?种变量选择方法中,CARS和VCPA选择的纹理变量建立的模型预测集识别率达到100.00%。研究表明高光谱和超声成像数据融合结合变量选择方法可以快速准确地鉴别原切和合成调理牛排。

关键词: 超声成像技术;高光谱成像技术;调理牛排;数据融合

Abstract: A novel method to discriminate between raw and restructured beef steal was developed by using hyperspectral and ultrasonic imaging. Hyperspectral and ultrasonic images of samples were collected from which texture feature values were extracted by gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). Four discriminant models were established separately using linear discriminant analysis, K-nearest neighbor (KNN), back propagation artificial neural network, and extreme learning machine (ELM) based on the hyperspectral image data, the ultrasonic image data or their fusion. We comparatively evaluated three variable selection techniques: successive projections algorithm (SPA), competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS), and variables combination population analysis (VCPA). The results suggested that the texture of restructured beef steak was uniform, and the ultrasonic image signal was weak and uniform, which was distinct from that of raw beef steak. The best models for hyperspectral and ultrasound imaging were KNN and ELM, with prediction set identification rates of 95.00% and 90.00%, respectively. After data fusion, the prediction set identification rate of the best model ELM was 97.50%. The prediction set identification rates of the models established based on the texture variables selected by CARS and VCPA were 100.00%. The results showed that data fusion between hyperspectral and ultrasonic imaging combined with a suitable variable selection method can discriminate between raw and restructured beef steak quickly and accurately.

Key words: ultrasonic imaging technology; hyperspectral imaging technology; restructured steak; data fusion

中图分类号: