食品科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (22): 337-344.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20230206-053

• 成分分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于GC-IMS结合化学计量法分析烧烤过程中温度对牦牛肉风味物质的影响

张浩, 易宇文, 朱开宪, 邓静, 胡金祥, 刘阳, 乔明锋, 白婷   

  1. (1.四川旅游学院烹饪学院,四川 成都 610100;2.四川旅游学院 烹饪科学四川省高等学校重点实验室,四川 成都 610100;3.肉类加工四川省重点实验室,四川 成都 610106)
  • 出版日期:2023-11-25 发布日期:2023-12-13
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技厅重点研发项目(2023YFN0064);四川省高校重点实验室项目(PRKX2022Z11); 肉类加工四川省重点实验室开放基金科研项目(22-R-06;21-R-17); 四川旅游学院工艺开发与技术支持项目(900201);川菜发展研究中心科研一般项目(CC21Z26)

Effect of Temperature on Flavor Substances of Yak Meat during Roasting as Analyzed by Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectrometry and Chemometrics

ZHANG Hao, YI Yuwen, ZHU Kaixian, DENG Jing, HU Jinxiang, LIU Yang, QIAO Mingfeng, BAI Ting   

  1. (1. School of Culinary Science, Sichuan Tourism University, Chengdu 610100, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Cooking Science of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Tourism University, Chengdu 610100, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Meat Processing in Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610106, China)
  • Online:2023-11-25 Published:2023-12-13

摘要: 为探究不同温度烧烤牦牛腿肉风味的差异,采用感官评价、气相色谱-离子迁移谱(gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry,GC-IMS)技术结合相对气味活度值、偏最小二乘判别分析、主成分分析对5 种设置温度烧烤牦牛腿肉进行研究。结果表明:在240 ℃烧烤7 min的样品(E)感官评价得分最高。GC-IMS共鉴定出82 种化合物,包含醛类15 种、醇类12 种、脂类24 种、酮类14 种、杂环类7 种、烯烃类3 种、其他类7 种;E样品(240 ℃)化合物含量最高,其次是D(180 ℃)、C(120 ℃)样品,F(300 ℃)样品化合物含量较E(240 ℃)低。烧烤风味关键化合物是乳酸乙酯、2-甲氧基-4-甲基苯酚、2-乙酰基-1-吡咯啉、5-壬酮、水杨酸乙酯、1-丙醇、(E,E)-2,4-庚二烯醛、1-戊烯-3-酮、(E)-2-庚烯醛、乙酸芳樟酯、正丁醇(单体)、3-甲硫基丙醛(二聚体)、2-乙基-6-甲基吡嗪、4-己烯-1-醇、(Z)-4-癸烯醛、反-2,4-庚二烯醛、苯乙醛、异丁酸乙酯,共计18 种。E样品具有烤肉、脂肪和花果的气味,是最佳的实验样品;C和D样品的风味低于E样品,具有坚果和烤面包的甜味和烟熏味。

关键词: 牦牛肉;烧烤温度;感官评价;气相色谱-离子迁移谱;风味化合物;气味活度值

Abstract: In order to explore the difference in flavor among yak leg meat roasted at different temperatures, sensory evaluation, gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS), relative odor activity value (ROAV), partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), and principal component analysis (PCA) were used in this study. The results showed that the samples roasted at 240 ℃ for 7 min had the highest (E) sensory evaluation score. A total of 82 compounds were identified by GC-IMS, including 15 aldehydes, 12 alcohols, 24 lipids, 14 ketones, 7 heterocycles, 3 olefins, and 7 other compounds. The total amount of these compounds in sample E (240 ℃) was the highest, followed by samples D (180 ℃) and C (120 ℃). The total amount of these compounds in sample F (300 ℃) was lower than that in sample E (240 ℃). The key flavor compounds of roasted yak meat were ethyl 2-hydroxypropanoate, 4-methylguaiacol, 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline, 5-nonanone, ethyl salicylate, 1-propanol, (E,E)-2,4-heptadienal, 1-penten-3-one, (E)-2-heptenal, linalyl acetate, butanol-D, methional-M, 2-ethyl-6-methylpyrazine, 4-hexen-1-ol, (Z)-4-decenal, 2,4-heptadienal, 2-phenylethanol, and ethyl butyrate. Sample E had roasted meat-like, fatty, flowery and fruity aromas, which was the best among these five samples. The flavor of samples C and D was lower than that of sample E, having nutty, toasty, sweet and smoked aromas.

Key words: yak meat; roasting temperature; sensory evaluation; gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry; flavor compounds; odor activity value

中图分类号: