食品科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (23): 277-285.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20250629-203

• 成分分析 • 上一篇    

四川紧压型红茶与红毛茶特征性风味代谢物的比较分析

杨群,杨艳,兰智祥,孙洪,练学燕,王立磊,戴前颖,杨天元   

  1. (1.安徽农业大学茶业学院,茶树种质创新与资源利用全国重点实验室,安徽 合肥 230036;2.四川省川红茶业集团有限公司,四川 宜宾 644000)
  • 发布日期:2025-12-26
  • 基金资助:
    四川省川红集团委托课题(KJ24038);宜宾市科技计划项目(2023NY006); 大别山实验室开放基金资助项目(DMLOF2024003);现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-19)

Comparative Analysis of Characteristic Flavor Metabolites between Sichuan Compressed Black Tea and Raw Black Tea

YANG Qun, YANG Yan, LAN Zhixiang, SUN Hong, LIAN Xueyan, WANG Lilei, DAI Qianyin, YANG Tianyuan   

  1. (1. State Key Laboratory of Tea Germplasm Innovation and Resource Utilization, School of Tea Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China; 2. Sichuan Chuanhong Tea Industry Group Co. Ltd., Yibin 644000, China)
  • Published:2025-12-26

摘要: 为系统比较四川紧压型红茶与红毛茶的特征性风味代谢物差异,采用高效液相色谱技术对茶多酚、咖啡碱等非挥发性代谢物进行定量检测,再借助顶空固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用对醇类、醛类等挥发性香气成分进行定量分析,运用化学计量学对四川原料等级相近的2 种未经过陈化的紧压红茶(CBT-1、CBT-2)及2 种红毛茶(RBT-1、RBT-2)的非挥发性代谢物和挥发性物质香气特征进行比较分析。结果表明:与红毛茶相比,紧压型红茶香气中青草气等显著减弱,甜香、陈香更浓郁且持久;非挥发性成分中,茶氨酸、茶多酚、精氨酸、谷氨酸、天冬氨酸和茶黄素-3,3′-双没食子酸酯6 种成分是区分二者的关键风味化合物;挥发性香气物质中,月桂烯、芳樟醇、香叶醛、2,4-二叔丁基苯酚、(E)-β-紫罗兰酮、(E)-氧化芳樟醇(吡喃型)和苯乙醇7 种成分是区分两种四川红茶(紧压型红茶与红毛茶)加工差异的潜在特征香气成分。该结果可为认知四川红茶风味特征、后续加工相关研究及产品研发提供参考。

关键词: 四川紧压型红茶;红毛茶;顶空固相微萃取;非挥发性化合物;挥发性香气物质;化学计量学

Abstract: To systematically compare the differences in characteristic flavor metabolites between compressed black tea and raw black tea from Sichuan, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used for the quantitative detection of non-volatile metabolites such as tea polyphenols and caffeine. Furthermore, headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) was employed to quantitatively analyze volatile aroma components including alcohols and aldehydes. By applying chemometrics, a comparative analysis was conducted on the non-volatile metabolites and volatile aroma characteristics of two types of unaged compressed black tea (CBT-1 and CBT-2) and two types of raw black tea (RBT-1 and RBT-2) with similar raw material grades from Sichuan. The results indicated that compared with raw black tea, the grassy note and other undesirable aromas in compressed black tea were significantly weakened, while the sweet and aged aromas were more intense and long-lasting. Six non-volatile components—theanine, tea polyphenols, arginine, glutamic acid, aspartic acid, and theaflavin-3,3’-digallate (TFDG)—were identified as the key flavor compounds that could distinguish between the two types of tea. Seven volatile aroma components—myrcene, linalool, geranial, 2,4-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol, (E)-β-ionone, (E)-linalool oxide (pyranoid), and phenethyl alcohol—were found to be potential characteristic aroma components that could differentiate between Sichuan compressed black tea and raw black tea. These findings provide a reference for understanding the flavor characteristics of Sichuan black tea, conducting subsequent processing-related research, and developing related products.

Key words: Sichuan compressed black tea; raw black tea; headspace solid-phase microextraction; non-volatile compounds; volatile aroma substances; chemometrics

中图分类号: