食品科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 424-435.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20250807-048

• 专题论述 • 上一篇    

我国食品安全协同治理:制度解构、实践困境与完善路径

魏麟,李春雷   

  1. (中国人民公安大学犯罪学学院,北京 100038)
  • 发布日期:2026-04-14
  • 基金资助:
    中国人民公安大学2026年新任教师科研启动基金项目(社科类)(2026JKF02SK08)

Collaborative Governance of Food Safety in China: Institutional Deconstruction, Practical Dilemmas and Pathways for Improvement

Wei Lin, Li Chunlei   

  1. (School of Criminology, People’s Public Security University of China, Beijing 100038, China)
  • Published:2026-04-14

摘要: 当前,我国食品安全协同治理已形成较为完备的制度体系,根据治理主体间关系与制度构成,可将其解构为以政府为核心的权威规制体系、政府引导下的市场自律体系以及政府支持下的社会参与体系3 个部分。然而,食品安全协同治理在实践中仍然面临诸多挑战:在以政府为核心的权威规制层面,政府内部主体之间存在着协同困境;在政府引导下的市场自律层面,存在着个体性自我规制内生动力缺失、集体性自我规制制度建设与资源协同不足的发展瓶颈;政府支持下的社会参与则面临着社会公众参与动力与治理能力双重受限、维权动机异化催生恶意索赔、社会组织角色冲突与功能弱化的现实挑战。对此,应当以整体性治理为导向提升政府规制效能,以分类指导为原则激发市场自律潜能,以助推引导为原则培育社会共治生态,逐步向“有为政府、有效市场、有序社会”的食品安全协同治理模式发展。

关键词: 食品安全;协同治理;自我规制;社会共治

Abstract: China has established a relatively comprehensive institutional framework for the collaborative governance of food safety. According to the relationships and institutional composition of governance entities, this framework can be deconstructed into three parts: an authoritative regulatory system centered on the government, a market self-regulation system under government guidance, and a social participation system supported by the government. However, the collaborative governance of food safety still faces multiple challenges: At the level of authoritative regulation centered on the government, collaborative difficulties exist among internal governmental entities. At the level of market self-regulation guided by the government, there are bottlenecks including a lack of endogenous motivation for individual self-regulation and insufficient institutional development and resource coordination for collective self-regulation. Social participation supported by the government faces practical challenges such as dual limitations in public participation motivation and governance capacity, the alienation of rights-protection motives leading to malicious claims, and the role conflict and functional weakening of social organization. Regarding this, efforts should be made to enhance the effectiveness of government regulation guided by holistic governance, stimulate the potential for market self-regulation under the principle of classified guidance, and cultivate a social co-governance ecosystem under the principle of supportive guidance, gradually developing towards a food safety collaborative governance model of “an active government, an efficient market, and an orderly society”.

Key words: food safety; collaborative governance; self-regulation; social co-governance

中图分类号: