食品科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8): 32-42.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20260101-001

• 食品胶体:组分互作、结构设计及营养学专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同分子结构甜菊糖苷与大豆蛋白的结合行为及对其感官特性的影响

冉佳鑫,郑键欣,杨韵仪,郭健,万芝力,杨晓泉   

  1. (1.华南理工大学食品科学与工程学院,食物蛋白与胶体研究中心,广东省天然产物绿色加工与产品安全重点实验室,广东 广州 510641;2.广州城市职业学院食品健康学院,广东 广州 511370)
  • 出版日期:2026-04-25 发布日期:2026-05-15
  • 基金资助:
    “十四五”国家重点研发计划重点专项(2022YFD2101302);国家自然科学基金面上项目(32572748); 广东省自然科学基金杰出青年基金项目(2024B1515020081)

Binding Behavior of Steviol Glycosides with Diverse Molecular Structures to Soy Proteins and Its Influence on Their Sensory Properties

RAN Jiaxin, ZHENG Jianxin, YANG Yunyi, GUO Jian, WAN Zhili, YANG Xiaoquan   

  1. (1. Research Center of Food Proteins and Colloids, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Green Processing of Natural Products and Products Safety, School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China; 2. School of Food Health, Guangzhou City Polytechnic, Guangzhou 511370, China)
  • Online:2026-04-25 Published:2026-05-15

摘要: 本研究选取3 种甜菊糖苷(steviol glycosides,SGs)——瑞鲍迪苷A(rebaudioside A,Reb A)、甜菊苷(stevioside,STV)及瑞鲍迪苷M(rebaudioside M,Reb M),系统研究其在水溶液中与两种大豆分离蛋白组分(大豆球蛋白(11S)和β-伴大豆球蛋白(7S))的结合行为,旨在探明不同分子结构的SGs与大豆蛋白组分在分子层面的结合机理,揭示两者相互作用对SGs感官属性的影响。结果表明,SGs可通过氢键和疏水作用与蛋白形成复合物,并且SGs与蛋白的结合亲和力受SGs分子结构与蛋白亚基结构的双重调控。具体而言,具有糖基团数量最多的Reb M与蛋白结合能力最强,其次为Reb A,STV最弱,但是所有浓度SGs的结合比例均小于20%;而对于两种大豆蛋白,11S与SGs的结合量大于7S。感官评价结果显示,在溶液中,大豆蛋白对SGs甜味的调控具有浓度依赖性,与0.1%大豆蛋白组分结合后,在低质量分数SGs条件下(0.1%),不显著影响甜味强度的前提下可有效削弱Reb A与STV的负面感官属性,在中质量分数SGs条件下(0.3%)会略微减弱3 种SGs的甜味强度,并仍能抑制部分Reb A与STV的负面感官属性,而在高质量分数SGs(0.5%)时,苦涩味的掩蔽作用变得有限。

关键词: 甜菊糖苷;大豆蛋白;分子结构;结合行为;感官特性

Abstract: Three steviol glycosides (SGs) with distinct molecular structures—rebaudioside A (Reb A), stevioside (STV), and rebaudioside M (Reb M)—were selected to systematically investigate their binding behaviors with two major soy protein components, glycinin (11S) and β-conglycinin (7S), in aqueous solutions. Furthermore, the impact of these interactions on the sensory properties of SGs was explored. The results indicated that SGs formed complexes with proteins primarily through hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions, with their binding affinity dually regulated by the molecular structure of SGs and the subunit structure of proteins. Specifically, Reb M, with the highest number of sugar moieties, exhibited the strongest binding capacity, followed by Reb A, with STV showing the weakest affinity. Notably, the binding ratios for all SG concentrations were below 20%. Regarding the two protein fractions, 11S showed a higher binding capacity for SGs than did 7S. Sensory evaluation revealed that SG sweetness was regulated by soy proteins in solutions in a concentration-dependent manner. Binding with 0.1% soy proteins mitigated the negative sensory attributes of Reb A and STV at a low concentration (0.1%) without significantly compromising their sweetness intensity. At a medium SG concentration (0.3%), it slightly attenuated the sweetness intensity of the three SGs but still inhibited some negative attributes of Reb A and STV. However, at a high SG concentration (0.5%), the masking effect on the bitterness and astringency was limited.

Key words: steviol glycosides; soy proteins; molecular structure; binding behavior; sensory properties

中图分类号: