食品科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (14): 399-405.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20251029-231

• 专题论述 • 上一篇    

论食品安全监管中的内部报告奖励机制

毋文   

  1. (广东医科大学人文与管理学院,卫生法制与政策研究所,广东?东莞 523808)
  • 发布日期:2026-08-24

On the Internal Reporting Reward Mechanism in Food Safety Regulation

WU Wen   

  1. (Institute of Health Law and Policy, School of Humanities and Management, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan 523808, China)
  • Published:2026-08-24

摘要: 食品安全风险隐患内部报告奖励机制在我国具有原则性法律规定,具体要在具备明确法律要件与效果的下位法找到实施依据。为了更好地保护公众健康,国家在食品安全监管中设计内部报告奖励机制,但其实施存在较大裁量空间,也容易侵犯劳动权益与经营自由。因此,内部报告奖励机制在特定条件下才可以启动,具体而言,需要满足报告人是提供潜在违法行为相关信息的自然人、自愿提供、原始信息、实质性推动执法进程以及适当处罚金额5 个条件。内部报告奖励措施的实施应平衡报告途径,规范奖励发放,并根据实际情况在事后进行评估与调整,以更好地增强激励效果。因奖励结果引起争诉时,应确立差异化的司法审查基准,对行政机关是否实施奖励进行严格审查,对奖励的方式及额度进行宽松审查。

关键词: 食品安全;内部报告奖励;吹哨人;协同监管;社会监督

Abstract: The internal reporting reward mechanism for food safety risks in China is grounded in principle-level legal provisions, but its concrete implementation must rely on lower-level laws with explicit legal elements and effects. To better protect public health, the state has introduced this mechanism into food safety regulation. However, its enforcement leaves wide administrative discretion and may easily encroach upon labor rights and business freedom. Accordingly, the mechanism can only be activated under specific conditions, namely when the reporter is a natural person providing information on potential violations, the information is provided voluntarily, the information is original and substantially contributes to the law enforcement process, and appropriate penalties are imposed. The implementation of internal reporting rewards should balance reporting channels, standardize reward distribution, and incorporate post-event evaluation and adjustment based on practical outcomes to enhance the incentive effect. In the event of disputes over reward decisions, differentiated standards of judicial review should be established—strict scrutiny should be applied to whether the administrative authority has fulfilled its duty to grant a reward, and more deferential scrutiny to the form and amount of reward.

Key words: food safety; internal reporting reward; whistleblower; collaborative regulation; social supervision

中图分类号: