食品科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8): 259-269.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20251024-189

• 成分分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

3 个品种柑橘的多维度品质分析及鉴别模型构建

方琳,徐正洋,王蒙,郭威,赵志磊,武琳霞   

  1. (1.河北大学质量技术监督学院,河北 保定 071000;2.北京市农林科学院质量标准与检测技术研究所,北京 100097;3.北京市农林科学院信息技术研究中心,北京 100097)
  • 出版日期:2026-04-25 发布日期:2026-05-15
  • 基金资助:
    “十四五”国家重点研发计划重点专项(2023YFD1600304)

Multidimensional Quality Analysis and Identification Model Construction of Three Citrus Varieties

FANG Lin, XU Zhengyang, WANG Meng, GUO Wei, ZHAO Zhilei, WU Linxia   

  1. (1. College of Quality and Technical Supervision, Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China; 2. Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China; 3. Information Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China)
  • Online:2026-04-25 Published:2026-05-15

摘要: 本研究通过分析3 个品种(纽荷尔、爱媛、九月红)柑橘的21 种基础感官品质、12 种营养成分及73 种挥发性物质,结合多元统计分析明确关键差异物质并建立品种鉴别模型。结果表明,纽荷尔的纵径、果脐直径、皮厚度、硬度、可溶性固形物含量(soluble solids content,SSC)、酸度、总黄酮含量、柠檬酸含量、酒石酸含量和VC含量最高;爱媛的果皮最薄、硬度最小,可食率和固酸比最高,苹果酸含量最高;九月红的果实横径最大,果皮a*值最大,葡萄糖、果糖和总类胡萝卜素含量最高;主成分分析、相关性和聚类分析共筛选出5 种非挥发性核心品质指标:果皮色差指数、横径、单果质量、SSC和VC含量。3 个柑橘品种共检出73 种挥发性物质,其中萜烯类含量最高,主要物质为柠檬烯和瓦伦烯;根据变量投影重要性>1和P<0.05筛选出8 种挥发性核心品质指标:瓦伦烯、柠檬烯、(+)-诺特卡酮、γ-芹子烯、α-愈创木烯、γ-古芸烯、β-芹子烯和β-愈创木烯含量。基于筛选出的13 种核心品质指标构建偏最小二乘判别分析模型,训练集和测试集的品种鉴别准确率均达到100%,证明最终筛选的核心品质指标可有效保留并表征3 个柑橘品种在品质维度上的绝大部分差异信息。研究结果可为柑橘品质评价、品种分类与消费者选购提供数据支撑。

关键词: 柑橘;品质评价;挥发性物质;多元统计分析;偏最小二乘判别分析

Abstract: Three citrus varieties, namely Newhall navel, the hybrid citrus Ehime, and Jiuyuehong navel, were examined for 21 sensory attributes, 12 nutritional components, and 73 volatile compounds. On this basis, multidimensional quality analysis was performed using multivariate statistical analysis to determine key differential compounds and establish a variety identification model. The results indicated that Newhall exhibited the highest values of longitudinal diameter, fruit navel size, peel thickness, firmness, soluble solids content (SSC), titratable acidity (TA), total flavonoids, citric acid, tartaric acid, and VC content. Ehime had the thinnest peel, lowest firmness, highest edible ratio and SSC/TA ratio, and highest malic acid content. Jiuyuehong exhibited the largest fruit transverse diameter and highest a* value, along with the highest glucose, fructose, and total carotenoid contents. Principal component analysis (PCA), correlation analysis, and cluster analysis collectively identified five core non-volatile quality indicators: peel color difference index (CI), transverse diameter, single fruit mass, SSC, and VC content. A total of 73 volatile compounds were detected across the three varieties, with terpenes being the most abundant, primarily limonene and valenene. Based on variable importance in projection (VIP) > 1 and P < 0.05, eight volatile core quality indicators were selected: valencene, limonene, (+)-nootkatone, γ-selinene, α-guaiene, γ-gurjunene, β-selinene, and β-guaiene. Using the 13 core quality indicators selected, a partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) model was constructed. The variety identification accuracy reached 100% for both the training and test sets, demonstrating that these core quality indicators effectively retain and characterize the majority of quality differences among the three citrus varieties. These findings provide data support for citrus quality evaluation, variety classification, and consumer purchasing decision.

Key words: citrus; quality evaluation; volatile compounds; multivariate statistical analysis; partial least squares discriminant analysis

中图分类号: