FOOD SCIENCE ›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 109-114.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-200911024

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative Study of Applicability in Empirical Solid Uptake Models during Ultrasound and Pulsed-vacuum Osmodehydrations

DENG Yun1,2,Yanyun Zhao3   

  1. 1.SJTU-Bor Luh Food Safety Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China ;
    2.School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China;
    3.Department of Food Science and Technology, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR97331, USA
  • Received:2008-07-22 Revised:2008-11-21 Online:2009-06-01 Published:2010-12-29
  • Contact: DENG Yun E-mail:y_deng@sjtu.edu.cn

Abstract:

The applicability of empirical solid uptake predictive models was assessed during acoustic/pulsed-vacuum osmodehydration, and the effect of vacuum or ultrasound on solid uptake kinetics was also investigated. Apple cylinders were submerged in a 60% (W/W) syrup under shaking (55 r/min), pulsed vacuum (13 MPa vacuum for 5 min + atmospheric pressure for 5 min + same vacuum for 5 min, then atmospheric pressure), or ultrasound treatment (50/60 Hz) for 3 h. The R2, χ2, RMSE and E values of seven selected models were compared, Two-term model presented the best fitting for solids uptake. The solute diffusivity ranged from 5.72 × 10-11 to 9.25 × 10-11 m2/s. Pulsed vacuum led to the greatest amount of solids gain (3.02%) and the highest diffusivity (9.25 × 10-11 m2/s).

Key words: apple, model, osmotic dehydration, pulsed vacuum, solids uptake, ultrasound

CLC Number: