FOOD SCIENCE ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (16): 279-282.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201116060

• Analysis & Detection • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative Application of Head Space-Solid Phase Micro-extraction and Simultaneous Distillation Extraction for GC-MS Analysis of Volatile Components in Chestnut Rose (Rosa roxburghii Tratt) Juice

ZHOU Zhi1,2,XU Yong-xia1,HU Hao1,CHENG Chao1,2,PAN Si-yi1,*   

  1. (1. College of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Biologic Resources Protection and Utilization of Hubei Province, Hubei Institute for Nationalities, Enshi 445000, China)
  • Received:2018-05-21 Revised:2018-05-21 Online:2011-08-25 Published:2011-07-26

Abstract: Head-space solid phase micro-extraction method (HS-SPME) and simultaneous distillation extraction method (SDE) were compared for their sampling effectiveness in GS-MS analysis of volatile components in chestnut rose juice. Totally 52 compounds were identified, including 17 hydrocarbons, 12 esters, 7 alcohols, 5 acids, 3 phenols, 3 ketones, 3 aldehydes and 2 heterocycles. Thirty-seven volatile components were identified by HS-SPME method and 19 by SDE method. Compared to SDE method, HS-SPME method has the advantages of rapidity, simplicity, avoidance of organic solvents, more kinds of identified components, non-destructive sampling and is therefore more suitable for the analysis of volatile components in chestnut rose juice.

Key words: chestnut rose, volatile components, head-space solid phase micro-extraction (HS-SPME), simultaneous distillation extraction (SDE)

CLC Number: