食品科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11): 235-242.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20231023-180

• 食品工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同功率超声辅助浸渍冷冻对牛肉品质的影响

栗俊广,岳晓楠,孙晨皓,赵建生,陈博,刘思豪,白艳红   

  1. (1.郑州轻工业大学食品与生物工程学院,河南?郑州 450000;2.河南省冷链食品质量与安全控制重点实验室,河南?郑州 450000;3.河南双汇投资发展股份有限公司,河南?漯河 462000)
  • 出版日期:2024-06-15 发布日期:2024-06-13
  • 基金资助:
    河南省高校科技创新人才项目(23HASTIT047);漯河市重大科技专项(202204); 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(32102045)

Effect of Ultrasonic-Assisted immersion Freezing with Different Ultrasonic Powers on Beef Quality

LI Junguang, YUE Xiaonan, SUN Chenhao, ZHAO Jiansheng, CHEN Bo, LIU Sihao, BAI Yanhong   

  1. (1. School of Food and Bioengineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou 450000, China; 2. Henan Key Laboratory of Cold Chain Food Quality and Safety Control, Zhengzhou 450000, China; 3. Henan Shuanghui Investment & Development Co. Ltd., Luohe 462000, China)
  • Online:2024-06-15 Published:2024-06-13

摘要: 为研究不同功率超声辅助浸渍冷冻对牛肉品质的影响,选取传统风冷和0、200、400、600 W 4 组不同功率超声波辅助冷冻处理牛肉,以鲜肉组为对照,分析其冻结速率、蒸煮损失、解冻损失、嫩度、色差值、水分分布和微观结构等变化情况。结果表明:超声波辅助可以提升牛肉的冻结速率,影响牛肉色泽和水分状态,减轻冷冻过程中肌肉组织结构破坏和品质劣变。当超声波功率为400 W时,牛肉冻结速率最快,且蒸煮损失和解冻损失最低,分别为32.44%和1.66%,剪切力与鲜肉组也最为接近;另外,功率400 W时冷冻牛肉可冻结水质量分数最小,为51.11%;低场核磁分析表明,T21振幅最大,T22振幅变化较小,水分分布也更加均匀;微观结构观察显示,适当的功率超声辅助处理下,能减少冷冻过程对肌纤维及组织网络结构的破坏,从而改善冷冻肉的品质。

关键词: 超声辅助浸渍冷冻;牛肉;冷冻速率;肉品质;微观结构

Abstract: In this study, the effects of ultrasonic-assisted immersion freezing (UIF) with different ultrasonic powers on beef quality were measured. The changes in freezing rate, cooking loss, thawing loss, tenderness, color difference, moisture distribution and microstructure of beef were analyzed after traditional air cooling or ultrasonic-assisted freezing at different ultrasonic powers (0, 200, 400 and 600 W). Fresh beef was used as control. The results showed that UIF could significantly increase the freezing rate of beef, affect the color and water state, and reduce the structural destruction of muscle tissue and quality deterioration during the freezing process. At an ultrasonic power of 400 W, the fastest freezing rate was obtained, as well as the lowest cooking loss and thawing loss of 32.44% and 1.66%, respectively, and shear force closest to that of the fresh meat. In addition, the minimum freezable water of 51.11% was observed. Low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis showed that the amplitude of T21 was the highest, and the amplitude of T22 was relatively small, indicating a more uniform water distribution. Microscopic observation showed that an appropriate ultrasonic power reduced the structural damage caused by freezing to muscle fibers, thereby improving the quality of frozen meat.

Key words: ultrasound-assisted immersion freezing; beef; freezing rate; meat quality; microstructure

中图分类号: