食品科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12): 10-14.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20210702-014

• 食品化学 • 上一篇    

酸汤对酸汤牛肉特征风味及品质的影响

吴文燕,胡萍,李娟,王晓宇,冯丹丹,石媛媛,张磊,蒋景竹,朱秋劲   

  1. (1.贵州大学酿酒与食品工程学院,贵州 贵阳 550025;2.贵州大学生命科学学院,贵州 贵阳 550025)
  • 发布日期:2022-07-01
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金地区科学基金项目(31960485);贵州省科技支撑计划项目(黔科合支撑[2021]); 贵州省生态特色肉制品科技创新人才团队黔科合平台人才项目([2020]5004)

Effect of Sour Soup on Characteristic Flavor and Quality of Beef in Sour Soup

WU Wenyan, HU Ping, LI Juan, WANG Xiaoyu, FENG Dandan, SHI Yuanyuan, ZHANG Lei, JIANG Jingzhu, ZHU Qiujing   

  1. (1. College of Liquor and Food Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China; 2. College of Life Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)
  • Published:2022-07-01

摘要: 研究酸汤(红酸汤、白酸汤、混合酸汤(红酸汤+白酸汤))煮制对牛肉感官品质、pH值、色泽、水分含量、蒸煮损失率、嫩度、质构等理化特性的影响,并结合气相色谱-离子迁移谱分析酸汤牛肉挥发性成分,评价酸汤牛肉综合品质。结果表明,与对照组比较,酸汤可显著提高牛肉的嫩度和水分含量,降低牛肉蒸煮损失率、硬度、咀嚼性、胶黏性,改善牛肉的色泽和感官品质。白酸汤牛肉蒸煮损失率、硬度、胶黏性、咀嚼性最低,水分含量最高,红酸汤牛肉水分含量次之。红酸汤牛肉与白酸汤牛肉嫩度无显著差异,红酸汤可以显著提高牛肉红度值和黄度值。混合酸汤对牛肉亮度值提升效果较好。红酸汤和白酸汤中乳酸质量浓度最高,分别为23.27、4.90 mg/mL。酸汤牛肉中共鉴定出挥发性风味物质55 种,不同酸汤牛肉挥发性成分存在明显差异;与对照组比较,酸汤煮制牛肉可降低醛类物质相对含量,增加酯类、酸类和酮类物质相对含量,其中,红酸汤牛肉酯类和酸类物质相对含量较高,醛类物质相对含量较低,感官评分最高,口感风味最佳。红酸汤牛肉主要特征风味物质为乳酸乙酯、丁醛、乙酸、苯甲醛(二聚体)、2-甲基丙酸等;白酸汤牛肉主要特征风味物质为丙醇、2-丁酮、3-戊酮、丙酸等;混合酸汤牛肉以酮类物质为主要特征风味物质。与对照组相比,酸汤牛肉中部分风味物质增加,形成酸汤牛肉特有的特征风味。综上所述,红酸汤牛肉挥发性风味成分丰富,感官评价及综合品质更好,红酸汤是制作酸汤牛肉的适宜选择。

关键词: 酸汤;牛肉;挥发性风味成分;品质;特征

Abstract: The effect of cooking beef in sour soup (red sour soup, white sour soup, or their mixture) on the sensory quality, pH, color, moisture content, cooking loss percentage, tenderness and texture properties were studied. The volatile components of beef in sour soup were analyzed by gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS) to evaluate the overall quality. The results showed that compared with the control group (cooked in water), sour soup significantly improved the tenderness and moisture content, reduced the cooking loss percentage, hardness, chewability and viscosity, and improved the color and sensory quality of beef. The cooking loss percentage, hardness, adhesiveness and chewability of beef in white sour soup were the lowest and the moisture content was the highest followed by beef in red sour soup. There was no significant difference in beef tenderness between red sour soup and white sour soup, while red sour soup significantly improved the redness and yellowness of beef. The mixed sour soup was more effective in enhancing beef brightness. The content of lactic acid in red and white sour soup (23.27 and 4.90 mg/mL, respectively) higher than that in their mixture. A total of 55 volatile flavor compounds were detected across the three groups of beef in sour soup and there were significant differences in volatile components among them. Compared with the control group, the relative content of aldehydes was reduced and the relative content of lipids was increased by cooking beef in sour soup. The relative contents of lipids, acids and ketones in beef in red sour soup were relatively high, and the relative content of aldehydes was low. Beef in red sour soup scored highest in sensory evaluation, exhibiting the best taste and flavor. The major characteristic flavor substances of beef in red sour soup were ethyl lactate, butyral, acetic acid, benzaldehyde (dimmer), and 2-methylpropionic acid. The major characteristic flavor substances of beef in white sour soup were propanol, 2-butanone, 3-pentanone and propionic acid. The major characteristic flavor substances of beef in the mixed sour soup were ketones. The content of some flavor substances increased in beef in sour soup compared to the control group, contributing to the characteristic flavor of beef in sour soup. In summary, beef in red sour soup was rich in volatile flavor components, and had a higher sensory score and better overall quality. Red sour soup was a suitable choice for making beef in sour soup.

Key words: sour soup; beef; volatile components; quality; characteristics

中图分类号: