食品科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 186-191.doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20180417-231

• 成分分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

HPLC法同时测定不同生长年限不同部位杜仲中5种苯丙素类成分

张子东,付冬梅,张威鹏,张 琳,祖元刚   

  1. 1.东北林业大学 森林植物生态学教育部重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150040;2.黑龙江中医药大学教育部北药基础与应用研究重点实验室,黑龙江省中药及天然药物药效物质基础研究重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150040
  • 出版日期:2019-04-25 发布日期:2019-05-05
  • 基金资助:
    公益性行业(林业)科研专项(201504701-205)

Simultaneous Determination of Five Phenylpropanoids in Eucommia ulmoides Oliv. from Different Ages and Parts by HPLC

ZHANG Zidong, FU Dongmei, ZHANG Weipeng, ZHANG Lin, ZU Yuangang   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Forest Plant Ecology, Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Chinese Materia Medica, Ministry of Education, Heilongjiang Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Natural Medicine Pharmacodynamic Material Bases, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin 150040, China
  • Online:2019-04-25 Published:2019-05-05

摘要: 目的:建立高效液相色谱法同时测定不同生长年限、不同部位杜仲中的5 种苯丙素类成分含量。方法:采用HiQ Sil C18色谱柱(250 mm×4.6 mm,5 μm),以0.2%甲酸(A)-乙腈(B)为流动相,梯度洗脱:0~12 min,4%~12% B;12~35 min,12%~14% B,流速1.0 mL/min,检测波长277 nm,柱温25 ℃,进样量5 μL。结果:绿原酸、咖啡酸、原儿茶酸、松柏苷、紫丁香苷5 种成分分别在0.04~1 mg/mL(R2=0.999 7)、0.001 6~0.029 mg/mL(R2=0.994 0)、0.001 6~0.04 mg/mL(R2=0.998 9)、0.008~0.04 mg/mL(R2=0.998 7)、0.013~0.029 mg/mL(R2=0.998 6)范围内线性关系良好。不同添加水平加标回收率为94.05%~107.02%,其相对标准偏差在0.95%~4.11%之间。结论:建立方法适合方法学验证要求,可用来对杜仲叶、杜仲干皮中5 种苯丙素类成分(绿原酸、咖啡酸、原儿茶酸、松柏苷、紫丁香苷)进行含量测定。不同生长年限杜仲叶中的5 种苯丙素类活性成分总量高于杜仲干皮。因此,在制备含杜仲保健食品时,可考虑应用杜仲叶作为杜仲干皮的替代物。

关键词: 杜仲, 苯丙素类, 高效液相色谱, 不同生长年限, 不同部位

Abstract: Objective: To establish a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for the determination of five phenylpropanoids in Eucommia ulmoides Oliv. from different ages and parts. Methods: The samples were separated on HiQ Sil C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) using a mobile phase consisting of 0.2% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B) with gradient elution (4%–12% B between 0 and 12 min; 12%–14% B between 12 and 35 min) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and detected at 277 nm, and the column temperature was kept at 25 ℃. The injection volume was 5 μL. Results: The method had good linearity in the ranges of 0.04–1 mg/mL (R2 = 0.999 7) for chlorogenic acid, 0.001 6–0.029 mg/mL (R2 = 0.994 0) for caffeic acid, 0.001 6–0.04 mg/mL (R2 = 0.998 9) for protocatechuic acid, 0.008–0.04 mg/mL (R2 = 0.998 7) for coniferin, and 0.013–0.029 mg/mL (R2 = 0.998 6) for syringoside. The average recoveries of spiked samples ranged from 94.05%–107.02%, with relative standard deviations (RSDs) in the range of 0.95%–4.11%. Conclusion: This method met the requirements of methodological validation, and it could be used for the determination of chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, protocatechuic acid, coniferin, and syringoside in different parts of E. ulmoides Oliv. The total content of five phenylpropanoid compounds in leaves was higher than in barks, suggesting that E. ulmoides Oliv. leaves can be considered an alternative to its barks in functional foods.

Key words: Eucommia ulmoides Oliv., phenylpropanoid, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), different ages, different parts

中图分类号: